Those of you who are arguing it's a question of media cozying to gain access, not a particular administration affinity probably have more of the right of it I think. I think there are preferences, and I think there is a bias, but I agree, the bias about getting first tier press credentials goes volumes beyond any D vs. R pettiness.
I think a more interesting study wouldn't be the one Lemur suggested, but a study of how much better independent bloggers did on reporting on the Bush adminsitration as opposed to supposedly partisan sources, like the NY Times yet again.
I know Ken Tarranto meant this as a "See, they are Democrat hacks", but I took it rather differently. In all the talk about traditional media outlets failing, if all they exist for the purpose of existing, is there any value there to be saved?
Bookmarks