Poll: What change would you support to narcotic policy?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 30 of 81

Thread: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    Quote Originally Posted by Strike For The South View Post
    Listen cowpoke, you're working backwards.

    No legit buisness can deal in drugs because they are illegal.

    This leads to a vaccum

    This vaccum gets filled by peolpe who stab people

    This vaccum turns into dog-eat-dog

    The violence gets ramped up

    By legalising the drugs these things will end, just like the mafia got out of the alcohol buisness.
    Sure, I agree with all of that.

    But as long as things remain the way they are, I'm not touching that stuff. If the situation changes, and it's sold by government outlets, for example, then the situation changes, of course(though I still doubt that I will try it, I love my beer).

    Bottom line is; I'm not going to fill the coffers of a crook. No way Jose. Don't care how great his offer is, I won't take it.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  2. #2
    Old Town Road Senior Member Strike For The South's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Between Louis' sheets
    Posts
    10,369

    Default Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Sure, I agree with all of that.

    But as long as things remain the way they are, I'm not touching that stuff. If the situation changes, and it's sold by government outlets, for example, then the situation changes, of course(though I still doubt that I will try it, I love my beer).

    Bottom line is; I'm not going to fill the coffers of a crook. No way Jose. Don't care how great his offer is, I won't take it.
    Why are we arguing?
    There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford

    My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.

    I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.

  3. #3
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    Quote Originally Posted by Strike For The South View Post
    Why are we arguing?
    Because you're Texan.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  4. #4
    Old Town Road Senior Member Strike For The South's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Between Louis' sheets
    Posts
    10,369

    Default Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Because you're Texan.
    Norweigan penis envy?
    There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford

    My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.

    I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.

  5. #5
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    Quote Originally Posted by Strike For The South View Post
    Norweigan penis envy?
    Yeah.... You tiny Texans just can't come to terms with my might Norwegian boner...

    But hey, given its incredible size, I don't blame y'all.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  6. #6
    Retired Senior Member Prince Cobra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In his garden planting Aconitum
    Posts
    1,449
    Blog Entries
    1

    Lightbulb Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    I think the backroom is about measuring your wits, not ~~ It is surpising how swiftly we moved from the opiates to sex... Tz-tz-tz...
    Last edited by Prince Cobra; 11-05-2009 at 19:20.
    R.I.P. Tosa...


  7. #7

    Default Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    Eating a pizza, unhealthy yet pleasurable
    Riding a motorcyle, risky yet fun (I believ 16x more likely to die)
    Drinking coffee, a stimulant, unhealthy

    So being "unhealthy", "risky" or "a drug" is fine. But obviously the goverment has some responsibility.

    About 5,000 people a year die in motorcyle accidents, and you are about twice as likely to die if you take a bike compared to a car. So that's 2,500 deaths a year the government could prevent by banning motorcyles. And all the extra injuries as well, probably 99% of motorcyle accidents result in injury. The rate of death is 66.7 per 100,000.

    So if you support motorcyles being legal, should you support any drug being legal that has a death rate of 66.7 per 100,000 or less?

    Some drugs have other concerns besides death, but I left the amputated arms and smashed in faces out of the motorcyle equation too because I didn't want to take the time to look it up.

  8. #8
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Yeah.... You tiny Texans just can't come to terms with my might Norwegian boner...

    But hey, given its incredible size, I don't blame y'all.
    You misunderstood when they called you vi KING. you got pointy ears that's all.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Senior Member Idaho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Exeter, England
    Posts
    6,542

    Default Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    Quote Originally Posted by Furunculus View Post
    by the rationale that we don't accept it as one.
    But do you agree with laws based on cultural and emotional responses or do you think there should be some method or evidence behind such decisions?

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    But as long as things remain the way they are, I'm not touching that stuff. If the situation changes, and it's sold by government outlets, for example, then the situation changes, of course(though I still doubt that I will try it, I love my beer).
    I wouldn't touch heroin and cocaine if it was legal. I'm just not interested.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephen Asen View Post
    Many owners of motorcycles are responsible people. Motorcycle is meant to be a transport vehicle.The example you gave is a simple abuse. Some drugs are used in the medicine and that's not illegal. Using your example, legalisation of the drugs is abolishing the speed limit.
    Not so at all. Most drug users are responsible people. Do you think everyone you see sat in a pub or stood outside smoking a cigarette is a wild and dangerous person?
    Last edited by Idaho; 11-05-2009 at 20:41.
    "The republicans will draft your kids, poison the air and water, take away your social security and burn down black churches if elected." Gawain of Orkney

  10. #10
    BrownWings: AirViceMarshall Senior Member Furunculus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Forever adrift
    Posts
    5,958

    Default Re: What changes would you support to our narcotics laws?

    Quote Originally Posted by Idaho View Post
    But do you agree with laws based on cultural and emotional responses or do you think there should be some method or evidence behind such decisions?
    both, but principally the first, and regardless i have little interest in drugs, only the problems caused by their criminalisation.
    Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO