I don't particularly care. Israel already has them. Iran doesn't, and we can stop them from having them. Israel has many more reasons than Iran to have them as well - but that isn't the issue, like I said. The less countries that are hostile to us that have them, the better.
It's really quite the false dilemma you're putting us for. So, in your point of view, your either for the West or against it? Thing is, I don't exactly see Iran as directly detrimental to stability in the Middle East. Compared to most countries, they are one of the most stable countries in the Middle East, next to Jordan and, yes, Israel.

To be honest, the current problem in Iran was created by the incompetent president of the United States, who was still in office less than a year ago.

You can certainly go off on an unrelated tangent on how America is evil, I wouldn't expect anything less from you
Obviously, I don't deal in abstract terms as "good" and "evil". I'm stating that the problem with the United States that Iran has was something that was created by the United States (and more abstractly, the West). Or did you honestly think that the Iranians have something against "the West" by nature?

This year springs immediately to mind.
Which actually makes me think of something else that happened, just about a year ago.

Perhaps so, but it hasn't stopped them supplying Hamas. Admittedly the biggest perpetrator of that is Syria, but Iran does it nonetheless.
Yeah, they keep saying that. Hezbollah is Shi'a, I can understand Iran supplying them, but Hamas? That would be a strange action indeed.