Pree-zactly. How else could Luther have had the unobstructed RIGHT to nail his 95 feces to the Wittenberg Church? Because he helped PAY for the danged door, that's how.
I think you and I and Louis, and many here, agree with this assumption of what we see as obvious truth. Nevertheless, we three have been North americanized to one extent or another, so may be biased... and many western European countries continue to build and subsidize places of worship. (Leading me to wonder about E.Europe, Asia & Africa)Originally Posted by E_MFM
I appreciate your further contribution:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
but respectfully submit that it misses the question: What is the duty of The State in this matter? To build, therefore to maintain, therefore to protect from harm, some facility for the exercise of free speech of a select group, to the theoretical suppression of the rest of the population, or some portion thereof?
However, the spirit of your post answers the question brilliantly: "Don't do it; problems arise, which gov't has no business solving" (to paraphrase).
So, then the question: Since you guys (Europeans) are still building and subsidizing church-type buildings and organizations... how can you get out of the business, if you desire?
Bookmarks