Education: that which reveals to the wise,
and conceals from the stupid,
the vast limits of their knowledge.
Mark Twain
The mathematical probabilities of carbon forming a strand of DNA. That is only slightly harder than forming a protein chain for something like a virus.
Don’t get me wrong. I am not trying to prove the existence of a God sitting on a throne in some heaven.
There would just seem to be some order or consciousness holding the universe together. If not, then why does observation and intent effect partial behavior?
Education: that which reveals to the wise,
and conceals from the stupid,
the vast limits of their knowledge.
Mark Twain
Sometime I think we limit the possibilities of other life-forms by sticking to the earth-standard carbon based model. I think it's possible that on another planet with a different chemical makeup, life-forms may use another element as it's base, with a completely different set of chemical reaction to function as life.
The .Org's MTW Reference Guide Wiki - now taking comments, corrections, suggestions, and submissions
If I werent playing games Id be killing small animals at a higher rate than I am now - SFTS
Si je n'étais pas jouer à des jeux que je serais mort de petits animaux à un taux plus élevé que je suis maintenant - Louis VI The Fat
"Why do you hate the extremely limited Spartan version of freedom?" - Lemur
I couldn't agree more. It's impossible to draw mathematical conclusions. We can however theorise about what is necessary for life to come into existence, and try to get a rough idea of the probability of each of those stages completing successfully. RND/DNA universe and all that. The bit I struggle with is how either of those two, the RNA universe of the DNA universe, could ever spontaneously come into existence. I'm not saying they couldn't, it just boggles the mind.Data points of known life is 1. Thus it's impossible to draw any mathematical conclusions, since some of the starting defintions are unknown.
As for the creator question, isn't it a little bit redundant? If God created the universe, then he created the laws of physics. If God created the universe, then he created those mighty forces that brought together dust clouds into stars and planets. If God created the universe, perhaps he designed those laws of physics, the distributions of mass in the universe, everything we know, precisely so that it would form life?
An analogy (a poor one, but hopefully it illustrates the point):
Is creation is like a river carving a valley, simply a product of forces of nature?
Is creation God making the river source, which then goes on to carve a valley?
Is creation God making the river source & the rock and earth so that a valley would be carved?
Personally I believe that if the ultimate creator of the universe created everything then saying "God didn't make earth, gravity did" is a self contradiction.
The irony is that multicelluar life is mindboggingly hard (probably harder than creating life itself, based on the current insufficient data) yet for us it doesn't seem that hard to cooperate.
Also remember that modern life has had billions of years to develop to the current life forms. Any primitive cell structure would not survive until today, or survive for long if created today.
Drone, the significant advantage coal have is that it can easily bind to 4 different atoms and also easily form double bonds or higher. Silica for example doesn't form double bonds as easy. So while non-carbon life cannot be ruled out, carbon is definitly the most flexible molecule when it comes to create chains and advanced molecules.
We are all aware that the senses can be deceived, the eyes fooled. But how can we be sure our senses are not being deceived at any particular time, or even all the time? Might I just be a brain in a tank somewhere, tricked all my life into believing in the events of this world by some insane computer? And does my life gain or lose meaning based on my reaction to such solipsism?
Project PYRRHO, Specimen 46, Vat 7
Activity Recorded M.Y. 2302.22467
TERMINATION OF SPECIMEN ADVISED
Somewhere around 13 or 14 billion years ago our universe was made or made it self that much we do know or at least think we know. So thats a fair length of time for complex elements and even more complex lifeforms.
I just dug up some old science books these figures coulds be out of date but the figures quoted are that our solar system by mass terms is made of around
70.13% Hydrogen
27.87% Helium
0.91% Oxygen
Straight away water can be formed which is a building block of our lifecycle water has some very important features.
1 As a liquid it can protect it from destructive ultraviolet radiation.
2 Waters ability to exist as both a gas, solid and a liquid allow it to spread all over the planet.
3 The ability of ice to float also means our oceans don't freeze solid very important.
Taking undersea vents and solar energy into account and a 4.5 billion year old earth its plenty time for me to be here typing on a computer.
They slew him with poison afaid to meet him with the steel
a gallant son of eireann was Owen Roe o'Neill.
Internet is a bad place for info Gaelic Cowboy
With so much unkown, I don't get how anyone could produce such probabilities - as long as being reliable is a goal in itself. I can indeed never remember to have read that the "probability of life arising" was small and that this is a problem for the possibility of life elsewhere.
Sorry?If not, then why does observation and intent effect partial behavior?
Runes for good luck:
[1 - exp(i*2π)]^-1
it's beyond everyones understanding...
We do not sow.
And Hoyle seems to have been off when it comes to the odds. Even if we assume the mathematical odds seemed right at the time of his statement, things have changed as we know more now so the odds are different.
Explanation for what? I cannot calculate the "right" odds but what I do know is we don't know much since we have not visited other systems not have powerful enough telescopes to detect signs of life. We have not even enough information to truly rule out life on other planets in our own solar system. In other words it is going to involve a whole lot of speculation to claim the chances of life are small.I assume you have some better more reasonable explanation?
I don't see the point in focusing too much on statements made bydeadscientists that also seems to have involved elements that were outside their own field.
If we can find the building blocks of life in space then maybe life is not so unlikely?
CBR
![]()
"I do not yet know how chivalry will fare in these calamitous times of ours." --- Don Quixote
"I have no words, my voice is in my sword." --- Shakespeare
"I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it." --- Jack Handey
Bookmarks