Results 1 to 30 of 86

Thread: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    BrownWings: AirViceMarshall Senior Member Furunculus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Forever adrift
    Posts
    5,958

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    Quote Originally Posted by Subotan View Post
    How can we defend the realm's sovereignty against enemies if we look like a bunch of rednecks?
    the way we have always done:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Royal_Navy

    :p
    Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar

  2. #2
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    Quote Originally Posted by Subotan
    if we look like a bunch of rednecks
    One will find all European countries have a large, populist rightwing. Of whom provocations and insults are not merely expected, but for whom this is an essential means to mobilise their electorate, to show them they are one of them.

    I shall maintain this is not about Belgium versus the UK.

    Even so, a slight expression of regret that Belgium (how have they ever wronged the UK?) should've been publically insulted by a Briton who, if he not represents Britain, was elected by British, would show why the UK was once a byword on the continent for good manners and inhibited political reticence.
    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  3. #3
    Ultimate Member tibilicus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,663

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    Quote Originally Posted by Furunculus View Post
    Isn't the RN due for massive cuts?


    "A lamb goes to the slaughter but a man, he knows when to walk away."

  4. #4
    Guest Aemilius Paulus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Russia/Europe in the summer, Florida rest of the time
    Posts
    3,473

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    Quote Originally Posted by tibilicus View Post
    Isn't the RN due for massive cuts?
    Yeah, I was just making a presentation the last week in my Comparative Politics class on that. Massive indeed. Especially those aircraft carries - ouch, they are everything to a navy in these times. But I do not see why Britain should sink into even deeper hole because of such a relatively unnecessary spending. As long as UK navy is comfortably ahead of Argentina, it will be alright, especially with the NATO.
    Last edited by Aemilius Paulus; 02-25-2010 at 22:25.

  5. #5
    BrownWings: AirViceMarshall Senior Member Furunculus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Forever adrift
    Posts
    5,958

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    Quote Originally Posted by Aemilius Paulus View Post
    Yeah, I was just making a presentation the last week in my Comparative Politics class on that. Massive indeed. Especially those aircraft carries - ouch, they are everything to a navy in these times. But I do not see why Britain should sink into even deeper hole because of such a relatively unnecessary spending.

    As long as UK navy is comfortably ahead of Argentina, it will be alright, especially with the NATO.
    lol, because we spend soooooo much on Defence!

    i didn't realise that Britains strategic interests started and stopped at the falklands........
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat View Post
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceej...CC9FA&index=16
    At around 2:00.

    Hannan protests an anti-fillibustering law by comparing this to a Hitler putsch by the German Parliament President Pöttering. A man who sadly never knew his father because he tragically died in WWII, which was influential in this well-respected Christian-Democrat's strive towards a democratic Germany and Europe.

    Dear oh dear.

    I link to the video because it shows another face of British conservatism. Christopher Beazley. He tells Hannan he can't say this, and asks him to 'step outside with him'. Now there's a British Conservative* for you. A British Conservatism that is more gentle, more 'British' too, taking pride from good manners instead of the absense of it.


    *Beazley has communists for breakfast: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prague_..._and_Communism
    hannan was right, blithely setting aside democratic institutions so that affairs can move 'forward' is something germany should be both familiar with and wary of, and as an object lesson to the EU it was very apt even if it was also a little tasteless.
    Last edited by Furunculus; 02-25-2010 at 23:06.
    Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar

  6. #6
    Guest Aemilius Paulus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Russia/Europe in the summer, Florida rest of the time
    Posts
    3,473

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    Quote Originally Posted by Furunculus View Post
    lol, because we spend soooooo much on Defence!
    Of course not, but most countries can use a defence spending cut, especially with their economy in such a state.

    Quote Originally Posted by Furunculus View Post
    i didn't realise that Britains strategic interests started and stopped at the falklands........
    They are the main ones under possible danger. Can you give me another similar example of a British possession threatened by a nation with a viable military? Gibraltar ? Argentina is the measuring stick for the Brits, as I said. It was my understand that if the UK had a comfortable superiority against the Argentinian forces, that would be enough for anything else. Or are you worried the Litvinenko affair may escalate ? I could very well be mistaken here, but I would need you to point out where more vital and threatened interests of Britain lay.





    You could have just enjoyed our rare agreement, moment of convergence on the issues of that outspoken MEP and left it at that, but noooo, you conservatives....
    Last edited by Aemilius Paulus; 02-25-2010 at 23:17.

  7. #7
    BrownWings: AirViceMarshall Senior Member Furunculus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Forever adrift
    Posts
    5,958

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    Quote Originally Posted by Aemilius Paulus View Post
    Of course not, but most countries can use a defence spending cut, especially with their economy in such a state.

    They are the main ones under possible danger. Can you give me another similar example of a British possession threatened by a nation with a viable military? Gibraltar ? Argentina is the measuring stick for the Brits, as I said. It was my understand that if the UK had a comfortable superiority against the Argentinian forces, that would be enough for anything else. Or are you worried the Litvinenko affair may escalate ? I could very well be mistaken here, but I would need you to point out where more vital and threatened interests of Britain lay.

    You could have just enjoyed our rare agreement, moment of convergence on the issues of that outspoken MEP and left it at that, but noooo, you conservatives....
    The first duty of the sovereign nation state, the provision of internal and external security, should not be subject to such budgetary belt-tightening when it:
    > occupies a mere 5% of annual government spending
    > is not the cause of the present financial difficulties
    > has not been grossly inflated in recent years, and therefore likely to be packed with waste

    oh how wrong you are, Britains military responsibilities extend far beyond such piffling local matters as the falklands:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British...ent_operations

    no, sadly i have the inescapable need to disagree with people who i believe to be misguided. :)
    Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar

  8. #8
    Guest Aemilius Paulus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Russia/Europe in the summer, Florida rest of the time
    Posts
    3,473

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    Quote Originally Posted by Furunculus View Post
    oh how wrong you are, Britains military responsibilities extend far beyond such piffling local matters as the falklands:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British...ent_operations
    No, I did not mean the places where you voluntarily intervene, in your imperialistic delusions, which your nation still retains to some degree, operate. I meant the dependent territories of your Commonwealth (i.e. Pitcairn, Bermuda, Gibraltar, Falklands, Tristan de Cunya [sp?], etc)

  9. #9
    Member Member Boohugh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    here and there in a heart of oak
    Posts
    378

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    Quote Originally Posted by Aemilius Paulus View Post
    Massive indeed. Especially those aircraft carries - ouch, they are everything to a navy in these times. But I do not see why Britain should sink into even deeper hole because of such a relatively unnecessary spending.
    Yeah, those few billion pounds spent on replacing carriers designed for and built during the Cold War makes all the difference when we're blowing £170 billion a year on giving chavs 6 bedroom mansions in London and paying for the Sky TV they need to watch because they don't work...

    In any case, the Strategic Defence Review hasn't been carried out yet so saying where any defence cuts would fall is pure speculation. There is also no indication the Royal Navy will be hit harder than the other two services if whatever government comes to power is so utterly shortsighted it decides to cut defence spending significantly.

  10. #10
    Praefectus Fabrum Senior Member Anime BlackJack Champion, Flash Poker Champion, Word Up Champion, Shape Game Champion, Snake Shooter Champion, Fishwater Challenge Champion, Rocket Racer MX Champion, Jukebox Hero Champion, My House Is Bigger Than Your House Champion, Funky Pong Champion, Cutie Quake Champion, Fling The Cow Champion, Tiger Punch Champion, Virus Champion, Solitaire Champion, Worm Race Champion, Rope Walker Champion, Penguin Pass Champion, Skate Park Champion, Watch Out Champion, Lawn Pac Champion, Weapons Of Mass Destruction Champion, Skate Boarder Champion, Lane Bowling Champion, Bugz Champion, Makai Grand Prix 2 Champion, White Van Man Champion, Parachute Panic Champion, BlackJack Champion, Stans Ski Jumping Champion, Smaugs Treasure Champion, Sofa Longjump Champion Seamus Fermanagh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Latibulm mali regis in muris.
    Posts
    11,454

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    Given the current political climate at home and the paucity of "Sun Never Sets" territories , the UK IS spending too much on defense spending. Politically, a majority -- at least from what I've seen -- would prefer the UK to reduce its military efforts, dialing it back to a brigade of ground troops, one naval task force, and the SAS. Only the SAS would be deployed in all but the rarest instances. If that truly is the case, then the rest of the monies are being wasted and could be re-apportioned to spending areas considered more salient.

    What are the figures regarding public support for a UK military that is more "actively" involved?
    "The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman

    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken

  11. #11
    BrownWings: AirViceMarshall Senior Member Furunculus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Forever adrift
    Posts
    5,958

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    Quote Originally Posted by Seamus Fermanagh View Post
    Given the current political climate at home and the paucity of "Sun Never Sets" territories , the UK IS spending too much on defense spending. Politically, a majority -- at least from what I've seen -- would prefer the UK to reduce its military efforts, dialing it back to a brigade of ground troops, one naval task force, and the SAS. Only the SAS would be deployed in all but the rarest instances. If that truly is the case, then the rest of the monies are being wasted and could be re-apportioned to spending areas considered more salient.

    What are the figures regarding public support for a UK military that is more "actively" involved?
    difficult to assess objectively, because the public have seen a military that is VERY actively involved, i.e. non stop decade long overstretch in nasty foriegn wars that never seem to end and appear to bring little obvious feel-good-factor.

    notably the public is sick of these wars.

    on the other hand, public awareness of, and sympathy to, the military is on rise, and short sharp feel-good wars like Sierra Leone and the Falklands have pretty wide support.

    this is one of the reasons RUSI laid out the Strategic Raiding Doctrine, because the British public at large are happy for Britain to remain a Great Power........ as long as they only have to put up with the feel-good wars............ so the doctrine focuses on high-intensity expeditionary and rapid-reaction warfare.

    This is being the very pointy end of a sharp stick; quick in and quick out, but it is also a valuable strategic capability possessed by only two other nations that can do it, so Britain can retain its Great Power status.

    This tolerance to feel-good wars could also be a cultural meme from times past, in that most of Britains history we have used the Royal Navy like a scalpel rather than the Army like a club, so we have three hundred and fifty years of hearing news reports like; "chief Unga-Bunga has taken the British Ambassador hostage and refusing British trade through his ports", swiftly followed by; "The Royal Navy blockaded Unga-Bunga's main port while Royal Marines stormed the palace and released the British Ambassador, the crisis is past." Hoorah for Britain!

    It is that kind of continual painless success that may explain why Britain remains more jingoistic that many nations on the continent, but it also puts limits on the kind of conflict the British public is 'willing' to stomach.
    Last edited by Furunculus; 02-26-2010 at 09:29.
    Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar

  12. #12
    Liar and Trickster Senior Member Andres's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    In my own skin.
    Posts
    13,208

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    I think it's fair to ask why the UK just doesn't leave the Union if they don't like it.


    a simple, yet very telling google search
    Last edited by Andres; 02-26-2010 at 09:26.
    Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy

    Ja mata, TosaInu

  13. #13
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceej...CC9FA&index=16
    At around 2:00.

    Hannan protests an anti-fillibustering law by comparing this to a Hitler putsch by the German Parliament President Pöttering. A man who sadly never knew his father because he tragically died in WWII, which was influential in this well-respected Christian-Democrat's strive towards a democratic Germany and Europe.

    Dear oh dear.

    I link to the video because it shows another face of British conservatism. Christopher Beazley. He tells Hannan he can't say this, and asks him to 'step outside with him'. Now there's a British Conservative* for you. A British Conservatism that is more gentle, more 'British' too, taking pride from good manners instead of the absense of it.


    *Beazley has communists for breakfast: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prague_..._and_Communism
    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  14. #14
    Tuba Son Member Subotan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    The Land of Heat and Clockwork
    Posts
    4,990
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat View Post
    Hannan protests an anti-fillibustering law by comparing this to a Hitler putsch by the German Parliament President Pöttering. A man who sadly never knew his father because he tragically died in WWII, which was influential in this well-respected Christian-Democrat's strive towards a democratic Germany and Europe.

    Dear oh dear.
    I thought I recognised him! That's the NHS hater!

  15. #15
    BrownWings: AirViceMarshall Senior Member Furunculus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Forever adrift
    Posts
    5,958

    Default Re: EU President has the charisma of a damp rag

    Quote Originally Posted by Subotan View Post
    I thought I recognised him! That's the NHS hater!
    you mean the person who recognises that other nations operatings other systems of healthcare achieve much better outcomes from their health service as a percentage of GDP spent?

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/da...ts-on-the-nhs/
    Interrupting my holiday with some thoughts on the NHS


    By Daniel Hannan Politics Last updated: August 12th, 2009

    149 Comments

    Five different BBC journalists have phoned today – presumably in response to this piece in the Independent. That’s the Beeb for you, I suppose: I’ve been setting out my views on healthcare in some detail over the years but, since I’ve been doing so mainly in the Telegraph, our state broadcaster hasn’t noticed.

    I am blogging from Dax where the feria is in full swing, the streets swaying with white-clad French people in red neckerchiefs and sashes. I love French ferias, and am still daydreaming of a repetition of this episode. But I am nowehere near a studio, so any journalists wanting a line from me will have to make do with the following.

    1. In The Plan, published last year and co-authored with Douglas Carswell, I set out at length a scheme to replace the current government monopoly in healthcare with a Singapore-style system of personal health accounts. The Singapore system produces better outcomes than ours for half the price. If we spent the same percentage of GDP on healthcare as now, but put equivalent power in the hands of our consumers, it seems not unreasonable to suppose that we would be much healthier. (Incidentally, the state pays for those who can’t afford their own accounts in Singapore, as in every developed country. It never ceases to amaze me how many British people have been convinced that free healthcare for the poor is a unique property of the NHS.)

    2. I am not the Conservative Party’s healthcare spokesman. I’m fond of Andrew Lansley, and I strongly support David Cameron as party leader. On this issue, though, I disagree with both of them.

    3. When I was in Washington last week, I joked that, within minutes of my speech, John Prescott would be accusing me of “insulting our hard-working doctors and nurses”. I over-estimated the old bruiser: it took him a week. The idea that I – or anyone else – would set out to offend 1.4 million NHS workers needs only to be stated to see how silly it is. You see how the Left works, though. Any suggestion that the NHS might be improved upon is shouted down as an attack on the people in it – which is precisely the point I was making about how hard it is to reform so large a bureaucracy.

    4. I particularly like Prezza’s idea that being “Progressive” means refusing to countenance any change to a system designed in 1944.

    5. It seems increasingly obvious that American voters are turning against Barack Obama’s plans. That’s not to say that the Dems won’t get something called “health reform” through: they have invested too much political capital not to. But British-style state-administered hospitals – that plainly ain’t gonna happen.

    6. Which raises the intriguing question of whether Britain would establish the NHS today.
    Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO