Thank you, MButcher!
Btw i can understand both Zarax's and Dugunz's approaches to history. I wold say that Dugunz approaches to the phenomena of history in a manner of, like Nietzsche said, critical point of view. And he's right: the history belongs to humans, and we have the right to criticize history and make our own value judgments concerning historical events, persons etc. because that same history involves itself in our everyday lives (indirectly, but it does involves).
Zarax stands on a monumental point of view, he sees the past events as a valuables independent on us, humans of today, and in this sense he puts values of historical events as something we, people of today, can not judge. That kind of approach is also legitimate one.
Anyway, if someone is interested in Nietzsche's tematization of history, and wants to approach the phenomena of history in a theoretical way, i'd suggest this book: http://records.viu.ca/~johnstoi/Nietzsche/history.htm
Sry for OT, but it's not a spam, although Jebi is a proud Romaioktonos![]()
Bookmarks