Dragon Age: The Aeducan Succession [Stopped]

[johnhughthom]

Beskie lost some dough, Romanic revealed as dual dagger wielding (rogue?) victim of an attack. Was he on his way back from relieving Beskar of some of his wealth?

[Renata]

No kills, interesting. Of course the perpetrators of the previous kill may have decided to lay low to place the blame on Renata. I say Imprison: Renata again and see if their patience holds. Of course somebody may have found or saw something last night which could change that view...

I realize no one dead and all, but ...

The dwarf passed the sealed entrance to the Assembly, pausing briefly to embrace the silence that covered the city; the sensation of solitude lasted only a moment as the thudding footfalls of plate-metal permeated the peace, a gutteral battle-cry managing to cut through the air quicker than the swing of his axe could.

The plate-clad assailant wheeled around with surprising agility and struck again ...

(Et cetera.)

Are you for real?

[johnhughthom]

That was posted before Secura edited in the write up.

[Renata]

All right.

[Pinman]

Personally I think we can let Renata out, and see if anything else appears in the next night's writeup. Or alternatively, although I don't think its the better move, we could just kill her now. Imprisoning her again is unlikely to yield the maximal amount of information.

So lets see, whos been quiet. How about we Imprison: Captain Blackadder?

What do you have to say for yourself sir?

[johnhughthom]

Unimprison: Renata Let's see what today's discussion brings.

[Reenk Roink]

Double A is innocent.

Edit: Maybe innocent is too strong but he didn't do anything last night.

Edit Edit: Vote: Renata

[Secura]

Check the Day Phase post, it does state that Renata is no longer imprisoned; prisoners are released at the start of the next day phase automatically, no need for 'unimprison' votes.

I'm really starting to worry that I've made the game too complex or that I haven't explained things in enough depth now. :/

[johnhughthom]

Double A is innocent.

Edit: Maybe innocent is too strong but he didn't do anything last night.

If you are going to claim a tracker role you may as well tell us everything, if you are genuine you will be a target and if I was a defender I would want a bit more from you before deciding whether to defend you. Of course you may have protection, that would be two innocent defenders in a 17 person game, unlikely?

Check the Day Phase post, it does state that Renata is no longer imprisoned; prisoners are released at the start of the next day phase automatically, no need for 'unimprison' votes.

It was simply an Unvote, I wasn't 100% sure of the mechanics of unvoting an imprisonment vote.

[Romanic]

I wonder if mafia need a higher attack bonus than their target's armour bonus to make a kill? Without a narrative writeup of "X attacked Y but failed", it's a possibility that this did happen.

*Checking*

EDIT: Nope, there's nothing in the rules. Secura, could you shed some light on this? What are weapons and armour used for in this game?

That's a bizarre question to ask after reading a no-kill writeup, when the said writeup didn't have any information that an attack happened. It's like you knew about it beforehand.

vote: Arpeg

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

recap (EST times)

17h45: Secura posts a no-kill writeup.
18h45: JHT makes the 1st post, noting a no-kill.
19h10: Arpeg asks about the night attack rules and mention the possibility of a failed attack.
19h22: Secura edits the writeup, that now shows a failed attack on me.

[Renata]

Check the Day Phase post, it does state that Renata is no longer imprisoned; prisoners are released at the start of the next day phase automatically, no need for 'unimprison' votes.

I'm really starting to worry that I've made the game too complex or that I haven't explained things in enough depth now. :/

Don't worry about it Secura; I was going to ask if I could vote since I was far too tired to re-read the rules, though. :) Guess I can.

[Double A]

That's a bizarre question to ask after reading a no-kill writeup, when the said writeup didn't have any information that an attack happened. It's like you knew about it beforehand.

vote: Arpeg

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

recap (EST times)

17h45: Secura posts a no-kill writeup.
18h45: JHT makes the 1st post, noting a no-kill.
19h10: Arpeg asks about the night attack rules and mention the possibility of a failed attack.
19h22: Secura edits the writeup, that now shows a failed attack on me.

This is one of those moments where you just slap your forehead and get on with your life.

vote: aTHIS

[Secura]

Guess I can.

Yep, you're free to vote. :3

[Pinman]

Unimprison; Vote: Mr. THIS

[Pinman]

To make it legal:

Unimprison; Vote: Mr. THIS

[Chaotix]

Double A is innocent.

Edit: Maybe innocent is too strong but he didn't do anything last night.

Edit Edit: Vote: Renata

There was a kill attempt. Renata is everything short of cleared innocent right now. We know she's not that axe-murderer. If we find there's more than one attacker, then we'll look at her again.

Vote: Reenk Roink

[Chaotix]

Actually, after reading the votes on ArpeggiateTHIS more carefully... it makes more sense to me right now.

Unvote, Vote: ArpeggiateTHIS

[Double A]

Wait, why are you voting for Reenk?

[seireikhaan]

Vote: Chaotix. Very scummy.

[Chaotix]

Vote: Chaotix. Very scummy.

This with regards to the first post or the second one (which corrected the first)?

[seireikhaan]

This with regards to the first post or the second one (which corrected the first)?

Both.

[Chaotix]

Suit yourself. You'll come around to the correct way of thinking eventually. I don't find you suspicious.

[ArpeggiateTHIS]

Let me get this straight: I'm being voted for guessing at why there were no kills? You guys are awesome! It only takes a bout of what you call "rational thought" to come up with the answer I did, here, take a look at the thought process behind it:
1. *Scratches head* No kills? Weird!
2. Has there ever been a game where mafia didn't make a first night kill? Surely they'd at least try.
3. What would lead no kills? A failed attack, a-la Beefdom?
4. Maybe there was, you know, a failed attack!
5. What would lead to this failed attack? Hey, shiny armour!
6. *Posts in-thread question*

Either way, I don't like this early tracker claim. Why reveal so soon, without any sign of protection? Just begging to be killed. Vote: Reenk Roink

[Splitpersonality]

Though I can admit StaccatoTHAT does look pretty scummy, perhaps it was just his first instinct to check for a mistake


I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for now.


Imprision: Chaotix, bandwaggon much? :P

[Captain Blackadder]

Let me get this straight: I'm being voted for guessing at why there were no kills? You guys are awesome! It only takes a bout of what you call "rational thought" to come up with the answer I did, here, take a look at the thought process behind it:
1. *Scratches head* No kills? Weird!
2. Has there ever been a game where mafia didn't make a first night kill? Surely they'd at least try.
3. What would lead no kills? A failed attack, a-la Beefdom?
4. Maybe there was, you know, a failed attack!
5. What would lead to this failed attack? Hey, shiny armour!
6. *Posts in-thread question*

Either way, I don't like this early tracker claim. Why reveal so soon, without any sign of protection? Just begging to be killed. Vote: Reenk Roink

It is called stating the obvious we all know why kill attempts do or do not occur we require no one to bring it up. What you are doing is a common scum tactic to appear to be town.

[Secura]

The writeup for the Day Phase is now up, including the items available for auction for this phase.

You should all have received an update on your current monetary situation, so I hope to return from work and see lots of bids. :P

[Reenk Roink]

Either way, I don't like this early tracker claim. Why reveal so soon, without any sign of protection? Just begging to be killed. Vote: Reenk Roink

Why do you have to take the bait?

Unvote, Vote: ArpeggiateTHIS

By the way, my role starts with no gold or items nor do I earn anything, so can you guys please make some donations to me to help me with basic needs? Secura is begging and donating allowed?

[Secura]

Secura is begging and donating allowed?

It is, yes; any donating of gold has to be through me though (IE, I get PM'd from the benefactor with a sum of gold to be given, then I pass the gold onto the receiver), so remember that. :3

[ArpeggiateTHIS]

It is called stating the obvious we all know why kill attempts do or do not occur we require no one to bring it up. What you are doing is a common scum tactic to appear to be town.

Maybe you should consider that I am town.

Why do you have to take the bait?

Unvote, Vote: ArpeggiateTHIS

So you're admitting that you're not a tracker? Then I was right to guess that you weren't. Nothing scummy about that.

Either way, you should all consider the fact that I am quite wealthy, as I have 10 gold to my name. Compare my riches with yours. Do I look like scum to you?

[johnhughthom]

Wealth = innocence?

Guess I should go kill myself now.