Vanilla mafia game strategy for woad&fangs:

Round 1: "Random vote: Renata"

This cannot be defined as a suspicious vote by anyone except Renata. Therefore, it is the safest move. It also joined no bandwagon, therefore it attracts no attention.

Split votes for you.

He's dead.

Round 2: Vote: Beskar "admit your guilt!"

"Admit your guilt?" Seems fake to me. Doesn't match the tone of your other posts.

ArpeggiateTHIS votes for you.

He's dead.

Perhaps I fingered your scum buddy, Apreg....

Yeah except you didn't, because they are both dead.

I'm not lurking post.

Adds nothing to the discussion.

Unvote, vote: Arpeg

Following my bandwagon, which is convenient for you because it eliminates the guy that just voted for you.

Next round: Vote Beskar

After he votes to kill himself, you top it on the excuse that he voted for himself, therefore he must be guilty. If so, he would have unvoted himself.

Bad vote again.... but hey, voting for anyone else would look both pointless and suspicious, and we can't have that now can we.

Next round: Dead proven innocent mentions my name as a suspect.

Woad: Care to elaborate?

As if you cared what his reasons were.

I vote for Renata.

Following up on my suspicions from yesterday, based on who was killed.

I'll give you a hint: mafia typically toss their votes on a lot of different people. The logical follow-up on Renata is not usually indicative of mafia.

Opportunistic voting is, though. Such as:

Immediately after I vote for Renata, you vote for me.

Tactical.

  • A dead innocent finds me suspect.
  • I'm voting for someone else... now, I have made someone else find me more suspicious. Renata is more likely to vote for me than not.
  • You don't have to explain your vote.
  • The timing is perfect. I die, you win.


A perfect storm of scummy!



Your arguments since then have stunk like a pile of rotting corpses. Which is fitting, considering you're responsible for one.