Results 1 to 30 of 184

Thread: Wikileaks reveals identity of Afgan informants

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #10
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Wikileaks reveals identity of Afgan informants

    Quote Originally Posted by Andres View Post
    It was not necessary to bring those people in danger. If those names would have been replaced by "X", we would still have known what we needed to know.
    Put your blame where it is due; if NATO had released these documents themselves they could've replace those names with an "x" easily, and their informants would remain hidden.

    But why so protective of these 20-something informants? How many days of civilian casaulties is that, really?

    EDIT: And let's not act like we have abandoned the asylum institution. What's problematic about bringing them here? If their lives are in danger, that's exactly the kind of situation our asylum laws are designed for.

    Quote Originally Posted by Andres View Post
    Is it ok to publish an article about your masturbation habits with your real name mentioned in it? I'm sure you wouldn't mind, freedom of speech being absolute and all that...
    If it is relevant to public life; no.

    Free speech has nothing to do with things that are not relevant to the public discussion. So yeah, if I'm a PM and someone decides to publish my masturbation history; sure, go ahead. If I'm just me, a nobody from Norway, then no, it has no relevance to public discussion and as such it has nothing to do with free speech, but is instead banned by privacy laws.
    Last edited by HoreTore; 07-29-2010 at 14:09.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO