Oh? Does that mean that people stop carrying Lethermans and such now? Just about anyone who works with their hands is usually not without one, on the job or at home.
Printable View
Maybe I'm not being clear:Quote:
on the job or at home.
*Most people in contemporary urban societies do not need to make use of such tools
*Those that do compartmentalize their use to work situations
*Hobbyists who use such tools confine their use to that specific context
*Consumers out about the town simply do not ever carry such tools and have no expectation of others carrying them in their environment
*Front-end/customer service workers have as their primary - and usually only - tool the computer
What;s so hard to get about this?
Quote:
Even nerdy engineers carry such tools in case they need to fix something.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montmorency
Listen, seeing a plumber walking around with their tool-kit is taken by the observer as part of the plumber's job. It's analogous to a man in a business suit carrying a briefcase.Quote:
They live in suburbs and get their hands dirty.
Now, if the plumber were then asked if they were currently heading to a job/assignment, and they responded, "No", that would be taken as bizarre.
Just as bizarre as a businessman-by-day going out for (non-business related) dinner with briefcase in hand.
I think you are a little hide-bound in your viewpoint. Obviously you live in a large urban center, but most people do not.
What you may think of as normal is actually a narrow view. Most men do ware such out to dinner, mostly because their wife would object, but they would come to the dinner table at home with such, and likely ware it shopping or around town.
Speaking of bizarre, why don’t you go to a Wallmart and report back on what you have seen. ;)
Half the US lives in cities of more than 1 million inhabitants...
In Bulgaria the law is the most retarded thing. We can't carry blades longer than 20 cm., you need a license to carry even a bb gun, you can't carry semi auto or full auto.. Oh but it gets better.
Say a guy picks a fight with you. Say he is an 80 kg. boxer. You pull a knife on him and stick him? You are at fault, you pay him damage and may eve get locekd up. You are required by law to answer his fists with your fists, never mind that he will punch your teeth in and you will have to spend 5000 euro to fix them.
Say some junkie pulls a knife on you in the street and wants you wallet. You can't shoot him. No, not even in the leg or arm. You'd be at fault and you'd get your license revoked and will have to pay him. Also you'll do several years jail time.
Say you're a watchman in a watermelon patch and a bunch of gypsies come with 4-5 horse drawn carts. They jump off, wielding axes and 30 cm. knives, threatening you. You shoot ONE in the leg with a legally owned rifle. You are guarding someone's private property, at night. Guess what happens - that's right. You pay the thief you shot a hefty reparation, and you go to jail.
Self defense and private property laws are a joke here. It's even funnier that the people whom you'd want to have a gun AGAINST are either the roma minority who are protected by the reverse-discrimination in the government and by a bunch of NPOs and Soros-es, or they are thugs and mobsters who own automatic weapons illegally and the police don't do anything against them. Sucks to be a regular citizen here.
Not being allowed to carry a knive of 20 cm doesn't sound that odd to me really, what purpose could it have other than hurting someone much more than you should want to
Sure, but it does not make what you describe as typical. Not all cities over a million are the same.
What is typical for the North East is not typical for the rest of the county. Many of those urban centers reach a million because they incorporate large suburban areas. San Antonio is not Boston. The norms are much different. Also as you say half live there and half do not. Again, different values and norms.
Some of what Vuk is experiencing is a culture clash. He grew up in a rural setting on a farm. The country is growing more urban, and much more risk adverse, to the point of idiocy actually.
I suggest he move west, not to the coast, but further west at any rate.
I almost always have a pocket knife with me. Never used it on people even when attacked. But it is useful for a whole lot of things. Also it's more than knives, there's can openers on it, a screwdriver, pincet,... All which have been useful outside my home.
No, it's just a good point about the masculine women you're asking for. As you said yourself, just because they were women there is no reason to assume they were actually feminine and not masculine according to the definition of these words.
The high school girl rivalries are only happening because the girls are raised with the same masculine values as the boys, they learn from a young age that they have to take what they can get and this leads to the struggles they have among eachother. Truly feminine girls would share the values of cooperation, sharing and the diplomatic solving of conflicts. A masculine culture that promotes solving conflicts through power gains simply corrupts the nature of these girls.
But 80% overall live in urban areas. Which is the point - in urban areas, carrying around tools common in rural areas is, well, uncommon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fisherking
The denser the city, the more surprising it seems.
Seeing a woman in a Hijab is surprising where I come from. Does that mean we should infringe on her freedom to wear one when she goes shopping?
Now you know what conservatives are afraid America will turn into. That really sucks.
First of all, you should not have a knife to hurt someone. If you have a knife to defend yourself, then its purpose is to stop someone, and that is binary. Either it is big enough or it isn't. There is no such thing as a knife being able to stop someone too much!
I just want to say here and now that I it is my decided opinion that a knife is NOT a suitable self-defense weapon in most modern countries (including the US), but if you are using it for one then it has two major functions: 1) intimidation and 2) incapacitation.
As far as intimidation goes, the bigger the better. If a larger knife intimidates an opponent to the point where they do not attack you, then your larger knife just stopped someone from getting hurt.
As far as incapacitation goes, giving someone a little cut is not going to stop them. You incapacitate them by '*#&$@ing them up'. If you do not '*#&$@ them up', then your knife is not going to help you. You either make them lose so much blood they go into shock or die, or you cut something they need to physically function in their attack. Anything short of that and your knife is not going to help you incapacitate them. If the point of the knife is self-defense, than the larger the better, because almost incapacitating someone does you no good.
That said, a knife, and esp a folding pocket knife is probably the worst possible choice for self-defense.
First of all, when you are being attacked, what are you gonna do? Dig through your pocket, clumsily pull it out and try to unfold it while the other bloke politely stands to the side and lets you? With a fixed blade, an automatic in a holster or holding pocket, or with a gun you can at least get your crap out fast, but not with a folding pocket knife.
Second of all, carrying any weapon is largely ineffective unless you practice retrieving it as fast as possible many, many, many times. Do you practice with your pocket knife? If you did you would probably realize how clumsy and ill-suited it is for self-defense.
The second reasons knives are horrible self-defense weapons is because you have to actually really know what you are doing with it or you will most likely only get yourself killed against an armed opponent.
Also, a gun has major intimidation, a knife does not.
Add on to that that you pulling the knife means that they can argue that you made a non-lethal situation lethal. Can you prove that pulled his weapon first? It won't look good in court even if you live when you pull a knife out stab some dude in the guts. In people's minds shooting is much more clean cut, but knives are messy and dirty and the bad guys carry them. You using one automatically makes people think of you as a bad guy.
Long story short, don't use a knife for self-defense. If you do, then don't use a folding knife. If you do use a folding knife though, keep it somewhere other than your pockets. If you do keep it in your pocket, keep it alone in a retaining pocket mean just for it where you can reach in easily to access it.
Better to just not use knives in self-defense.
Ok, if you say so mate. Masculine = greedy and evil and Feminine = Angelic and Sweet.
There is no point in having this conversation any longer.
Wouldn't it be under this franchise or something where you got to adhere to rules? (i.e Don't trash talk customers or discriminate)
Sources: Reading the documents my parents got when they use to own a Quiznos.
No it is not. Perhaps in an office or classroom, or where ever you have not noticed them.
Men carry them in their pockets and women carry them in their hand bags. Perhaps it is only a credit card sized object with a small blade, tweezers, etc. A woman may have a nail file and perhaps clippers. Still tools. You may carry a pin, a tool for writing. People carry the tools they think they may need. Urban or rural that makes no difference.
You are right, I should have the right to, and the clinic should have the right to tell me I cannot carry a pocket knife, but that doesn't make it any less stupid. There are lots of stupid things that can be done but should not be done.
Good point, how would anyone really know who is carrying a pocket knife when they are in their pocket or purse?
If you say so. It doesn't matter anyway as the definition of feminine is not what this topic is about. It is about why America is turning into Land of Sheep and Home of the Fools. It is about why people can be so stupid and feel so threatened about such stupid things.
Well, while I have no problem with pocket knives - and we are speaking of tools more generally -Quote:
Originally Posted by Vuk
But not that generally. Come on now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fisherking
The crux: there is no way you can convince me people in dense cities - not urban sprawl interspersed with suburbs and farmland - are not used to individuals just carrying around tools for construction, mechanics, agriculture, or whatever. If they see such a thing, they'll assume the carrier is a blue-collar worker on the job. They would be very surprised to see someone carrying such things just because they might come in handy at some point in the day.
Because that doesn't make any sense. In the city, such tools are deployed either on jobs/job sites, or very rare DIY situations (in which case there's no need for them to leave the home).
How is this at all controversial?
Anyway, as I was saying, a hijab is just a headscarf and does not cover the face. As for bombs, where the heck would that fit between the head and the fabric? That's like something out of a cartoon.
I'm sympathetic to this perspective, but in the end there's the concern that permitting - or, returning to - service discrimination based on ethnic (broadly speaking) categories might result in an unwanted level of social friction.Quote:
Originally Posted by rvg
Yes, tht only mattered when you didn't like the definition of someone else.
Because it lowers violence and the crime rate. I remember people in gun threads saying that while the US did not implement sweeping gun control,the crime rate has steadily gone down in recent years. Obviously that supports my argument that more femininity lowers crime rates and violence.
You're absolutely barking up the wrong tree buddy, nothing about this is stupid, masculinity is not the solution, it is the problem.
The problem with monocausal explanations is that they not only ignore other factors, but discount the potential that their own causality might just be illusory.Quote:
Obviously that supports my argument that more femininity lowers crime rates and violence.
This kind of thought-process is of the same sort as, 'My mother has suddenly died, so the woman who moved into the village a month ago must be a murderous witch!'
Good for you. I find they come in handy quite often when away from my house.
First of all, I meant burqa, not hijab. I know the difference, but I typed the wrong word.
Second of all, does it really matter if people are unused to seeing it? Does that make it right for them to say that someone cannot? Esp when a pocket knife poses significantly less danger than lots of things they allow?
And yes, it does make sense. It is the same reason I carry a flashlight. Not because I go out and say "Hey, I am gonna drop something in a dark hole and need a flashlight to see it today!", or "I think tonight is a nice night to break down!", but because it is one of three easy to carry tools that come in handy in random situations fairly often, and are not a pain to carry around. A leatherman multi-tool, a flashlight, and a folding pocket knife are three things I carry on my belt and in my pocket everywhere (including when I go out to eat).
It is for the same reason I keep a short-handled, flat shovel, a fire extinguisher, a first-aid kit, a sand-log, and a hatchet in my car at all times: just because they may come in handy at some point in the day, and I would rather have them at that time than not. Why doesn't that make any sense? Or would you rather be the guy who pays out his rump for a service he could easily have done himself?
Really? lol
Yep.Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
Flashlight: Depends on the size. If it's pen-sized, sure whatever. Maybe you forget your phone at home and need to find something that rolled under a desk.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vuk
Multi-tool: Why do you need a pocket knife if you're carrying one of these?
Car: Keep whatever you need in there, you spend a lot of time in the sticks anyway. The point is that there's no need to carry this stuff on your person at all times. Take me as a representative of the big city; that's how it is.
Who even wears a burqaQuote:
First of all, I meant burqa, not hijab. I know the difference, but I typed the wrong word.
Why have a folding knife if I have a multi-tool? Because a folding knife is a lot easier and quicker to access, so I don't like to use the one on the multi-tool unless I have to. The multi-tool itself is great for all kind of other stuff though. (I got the Leatherman Wave for Christmas two years ago and fell in love with it)
If you are not trained with a knife and try to defend yourself with it, you will hurt yourself