You seem to be a lot of talk, but how do we know if you are legit, huh?Quote:
Originally Posted by Earthling
Here's a question for you Earthling, if you are such a muffin enthusiast, what is your favorite kind? Speak wisely here.
Printable View
You seem to be a lot of talk, but how do we know if you are legit, huh?Quote:
Originally Posted by Earthling
Here's a question for you Earthling, if you are such a muffin enthusiast, what is your favorite kind? Speak wisely here.
No handshaking, scumbag.Quote:
Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name
Hey, we are all scum here. Least you can do is respect each other...
unless... you are not a scum.
True, there's no way a random townie can really know I'm legit right now, but I am telling the truth about everything I said so far, I'm just asking folks to consider the evidence as it shows up. And it's self-evident to both me and Renata that neither of us was responsible for silencing the other. I know nothing I did had anything to do with Renata, and if she randomly decided to silence me, why she would pretend to be silenced herself and nearly let herself get lynched is a mystery. I think the same would be obvious to her.
So a third party definitely caused this to happen to both of us (possibly more people). I'd say that third party is looking obviously scummy, doubly so since Renata almost got lynched because of them. And there's no particular hurry now, we'll hear from Renata or anyone else involved soon and see if any more evidence adds up.
(and ACIN I don't want to answer in a way that distracts others as the real details are unrelated and I have no desire to attempt signaling of my game role. Though I could answer that with a funny response that does so it's not worth it right now)
I dunnow. Maybe she's like me and likes the thrill of bullet dodging the lynch every day when she's mafia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Earthling
It can't possibly be silly Day 1 crap. Inconceivable.
LOL LITTLE BROTHER TRYING TO PLAY IN THE BIG BOY GAME.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zack
I just wanted a funny response man. No signaling of anything. People take this game way too seriously (cue my anger at what's-his-face earlier).Quote:
Originally Posted by Earthling
It's easy, if under pressure, just lurk and some one else will get flagged up.
Oh, the irony...Quote:
Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name
Well the tough thing is I think my in game signalling response would have been quite funny too.
But since you asked so kindly I can't help but oblige.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
LOL so you were What's-his-face! Maybe try reading my posts fully before you comment! :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::l augh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::lau gh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh ::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:Quote:
Originally Posted by Zack
/tribesman
YES THIS IS AMAZING.Quote:
Originally Posted by Earthling
If you're not chaotic (or some other non-evil character), then I will eat my hat.
It is quite a big hat, I might add.
oh right best of luck on your exam tomorrow. I'm sure we'll hear from Renata and Major Robert Dump at least by the end of night, and the chaotics have more targets to consider now besides just her if they dare.
Pics of the hat or get out of here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zack
Also, do you really not know my playing style?
Oh thank you! This was a healthy break from studying and I knew nothing would be happening right now so I figured might as well make some people laugh by being typical ACIN. Might post much later tonight with something more serious if Renata and Dump post something.Quote:
Originally Posted by Earthling
I've got an alternate theory, Earthling.
It was you who zapped Renata with your stupid silence ability. At least she posted something, you didn't post anything because it never occurred to you that smileys were okay. Meanwhile, you stay silent, knowing that when Renata can talk again she will tell what happened, so instead you say it happened to you as well.
I find it far more likely that more than one person has this ability than one person can use it on multiple people.
I have no link to Seon, other than the fact that I voted with him on day one. I encourage all to go back to the end of day one, and see that it was Seon who made a max vote to put Blackadder to the point of no return. Had I voted 10 on anyone else, it would not have mattered. Before Seon voted his 10 on blackadder, I was trying to decide on which leading candidate to vote one: Seon, Blackadder or byzanitne Knight. Seon voted for Black, Black was unsavable based on numbers, so I put in a last minute vote in hopes of turning a profit because I did not fully understand the rules. If you notice on day 2 I did not vote at all, because it was pointless since I knew that YLC was likely a townie based on B-Rays post.
So the question is why are you trying to dogpile on me? Are you the one who tried to kill me last night? for reasons I won't say, no I don't think you were. You or your scummy friend failed, but it was not I who silenced Renata or you, I simply defended myself. It wouldn't surprise me if you try to silence me for Day 3, since I was the first person to point out that a silenced person was unable to vote.
How would I?Quote:
Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name
Besides, bad cop out is bad.
It's actually quite a good cop out since...well I don't mean to toot my own horn but I kind of made an epic play in the star wars mafia game. One that no one really expected, probably because it was so stupid, but that is neither here nor there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zack
If we want to talk about bad cop outs, lets talk about yours. specifically your lack of a cop out completely in regard to showing pics of this "big hat" of yours.
Major doesnt seem like scum to me, If a doctor could try and protect him tonight, that would be good. Also, no vigilante kills, I'd like to see how many kills mafia have in one night.
By duping people into spending money to defend themselves after the first nights murder frenzy, the Chaotics will eventually be able to out bet anyone on lynches in conjunction with the silence ability. Earthling's willingness to so easily incriminate me in a far-fetched hypothesis shows far more ill intent than anything I have done to date. A defensive area attack in response to an action? Please. Also note that he did not say what action, because if he said he tried to kill me and then Renata says she tried to steal from me, well, then the story would not add up because that would make me so powerful I was a game breaker. Earthling set it up perfectly, though, because by text walling on day 1 he knew people would notice his absence on day 2, and they did. When he returns, he has the perfect alibi: he was afflicted by the very trick he used on someone else. Convenient. I make an easier target because I was trying to acquire a bulletproof item and failed, so Earthling is under the false impression that I am unable to defend myself and therefore people will be more likley to murder me
I suggest you spend some money on self defense tonight, Earthling. I hope your action on the first night wasn't purchased, because that would mean you will be near broke.
Ah, coming out with a second round of really baseless accusations before even hearing a response. I'll say come at me too, I think it quites adds up by now you're a chaotic or other non-evil and we'll see what happens.
Two things and I think it's a full response to everything relevant, everything I know anyway.
Major, that was a bad claim the first time you insinuated it and it's still bad. True, neither of us can "prove" it right now but it doesn't matter to me. I'm going to come right out and say I fully trust that Renata didn't try to silence me and the conclusion follows she's not a scum as so much scum effort is probably behind that and her attempted lynch.Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
Otherwise, I doubt two independent people have this as their night ability, and I really doubt one non-scum person has a regular night ability to silence 2+ people a night, prevent them from wagering and so on. My first thought was that this was a one-time event for some other reason, but the recent theory that this related to some "nexus" of night actions really makes sense. And either of those two ways, a third person was the cause of this, that's settled here and now, so yes, I'm being repetitive about it but it's a huge sort of thing and the best lead or anything I can go after right now anyway.
I kinda said this before but I'll list all of it to be clear. It's a combination of thread voting behavior that could be easily explained by scumminess, and secondly, as I mentioned, a strong indication that you are assuming things are or are not true that are completely inconsistent with a townie Role PM.Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
Your first claim about siding with Seon on the lynch was that you just didn't understand how betting worked and wanted to jump in and make a profit. Really, it could be true, but we can't just take that at face value. If I had been able to post during the day at any time I certainly would have pointed this out and gone for you as a lynch candidate over Renata.
As for the second important point, there is a huge swath of evidence here that strikes me as odd. And you've been active this whole time so I don't think to me it's fair game to have overlooked the rules or your own PM or something by now, even if that's supposedly typical around here but I wouldn't know that. What you've said would indicate you are paying attention and making solid analysis of what's going on - at least, if you were a townie.
Yet then you overlook really obvious things that you'd think you would catch but a scum may let slide. You act all surprised that, say, a member of the Bizarro faction came up neutral and another evil or that "cover roles" could exist on various factions after Seon died. You suggested the "Evil Mafia" faction could have up to 8 members and this is extremely inconsistent with what I'd expect any townie's PM to suggest about any faction, their own or a rival's. I've got a really, really strong indication that at least a couple of the mafia factions total around 4 or 5 members and several other players suggest their impression is the total is around 9 or 10 factions. Yet you claimed things like "multiple factions per side" (evil vs. chaotic) and get all this way off. For any player taken in a vacuum lots of stuff like this it's an indication there's something extremely different about their Role PM, information it lacks or additional scum information it has, in either case non-townie.
And all the claims from you about vigilantes and writeup analysis have seemed highly discouraging and anti-town. Not to mention how you implied people will be killed based on how the items were voting and all the mutual alliances there. 10% self-defense or retaliation from a townie perspective doesn't lend itself to being a "big deal" but that's kinda what you imply - you're not alone on this count, but you were active in all of that item mess. You also claimed to be attacked yourself and survived, and only Ironside says he did that among other people. At the very least by the end of this phase I'd like to find out more of the truth behind that story.
As for the actual kills, maybe on aside here but it could relate to the above, I just had an observation to present. I think everyone attacked by a "dark figure" was attacked by the chaotics - the others could have been vigs, but that would be three total including Seon due to the chaotics. Looking at the kills, it seems like Seon killed ByzKnight specifically to get him off of his back in the future. Given that they had no expectation Seon were die it probably took the chaotics by surprise that he did, that conclusion is inescapable and in fact part of why so many of you voted Renata - but it could go for others just as easily.
Keep coming up with these crazy theories and inane schemes to catch crooks, people.
At this rate, I expect you to find all the crooks by the final day, when I rise from the grave to slit all your throats.
To address his second reply, though we're really want to hear from others anyway. I see no need to address threats against me and stuff like that because it's not going to change my plans and I already knew the risk of being killed by scum over this silencing deal was there from the start.
See, here's a hallmark of a hasty scum reply. Earlier, you were basically suggesting that anyone could have had the silence ability, and it could be harmless and doesn't make them scum, Renata and myself just wound up silenced independenty of any underlying cause, etc... Yet here, you clearly imply that you believe it's a purely chaotic thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
Is that actually what you believe? That the silencing is due to the scum? And then surely you'd be willing to go to whatever ends to get to the bottom of it if it's a clear thing to do to fight the scum? In fact, if you believe that one of either me or Renata was the victim of the silencers and the silencers are the chatoics, you should furthermore believe that's proof that said victim is NOT scum and be going all out to set them up as a townie leader, just about as much as someone who was proven to have survived an attack from the scum.
Oh, and I take back what I said about Major going after Earthling like that? You do realize that having that ability may be item related and Earthling wasn't necessarily calling you scum, right? But your response is awful :P
Bad Major!
If only things were that simple...but it never really is that simple, is it?Quote:
Originally Posted by ByzantineKnight
Pancake.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seon
Nah, to be clear, I was calling him scum. As soon as I found out Renata was also silenced I've been working on the assumption the whole silencing ability is very scummy, in general. Your theory was a very new idea to me I hadn't thought of, but then when I realized my last night's action on Major which appeared to just be harmless could have been related, it was in part because I already thought he was scummy that I posted. If I thought it was solely some "self-defense" item and not also scummy I would have tried to think of a way to talk more to Renata, (but I couldn't claim any non-credit night actions in private to her) after you posted that, but before I said more on thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by ByzantineKnight
Your reasons for not believing Renata scum cannot also apply to you. First off, your revisionist mafia history is a little tiring. Renata did not "almost" get lynched, and as someone with no connection to Renata one would think I would lead that bandwagon. It was never even close, and at any time she could have showed up to defend herself were she faking, and no one would have been the wiser because she would not have had any link to the silenced person whatsoever. In terms of this so called "evidence" it applies even less to you. Your name barely came up in terms of lynching. Yet you crawl out of the woodwork and start making accusations based on "patterns" and numbers of teams and whatnots.
I find the timing of your accusations to be suspect since they came right after I pointed out that perhaps one of the "victims" was not a victim at all.
Also, you said You suggested the "Evil Mafia" faction could have up to 8 members and this is extremely inconsistent with what I'd expect any townie's PM to suggest about any faction, their own or a rival's
I made no claim that the info came from a role PM. Yet you also suggest that I should know based on my townie-PM that a faction can have multiple alignments, I should know that Chaotic has cover roles, and I should know how many factions and how many faction members there are? Interesting....because my townie PM had none of that info, and you would probably know that were you a townie. What it did have, was info which told me who my faction enemies are. It did not tell me who my other faction members were, nor did it tell me any of my enemies. Some peoples PMs may have had some Easter Eggs like that, but they were far and few between and for very special roles I am sure. Your argument holds even less water when one considers that the rules are there for everyone to read, and my overlooking something buried deep in the rules in no way proves what faction I am in. As of day 2, people were still asking under what circumstances they would win their credits back after a bet. Are they Chaotic too?
THIS.Quote:
Originally Posted by ByzantineKnight
I concur with this statement.
https://i1110.photobucket.com/albums...g?t=1303700906
...Quote:
Originally Posted by ByzantineKnight
I aten't dead yet.
...
Could somebody get the darn body off of me?!
No, I meant saying that it was him that silenced you and Renata didn't mean for sure he was scum, being item based it is neutral. His response was scummy though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Earthling
EDIT: Cleric! Rez plzz!? I want to try some of fluffy's syrup with some tasty Seon-cake and its hard to do that whilst decomposing.
He very clearly suggested that I silenced both him and Renata with some uber ability. How is that not accusing me? Then he posts that he never said it was a scum ability, and I never said it was a scum ability, but then when I do suggest its a scum ability that it means that I know its a scum ability and therefore I must be scummy. This is rich.Quote:
Originally Posted by ByzantineKnight
Even richer is this mystery action he used on me. Notice that he loves to throw around that factoid, but fails to tell what action it was.
If you get rezzed and I don't, then I am coming back as a zombie to kill you.Quote:
Originally Posted by ByzantineKnight
To the latest response - I've said from the beginning that this silencing business was particularly scummy. I never suggested it was a mundane ability of a non-scum, I proposed at the start it could have been a one-time event related to Byzantine's death but if not that, it would be a scum. As for you, Major, your responses are speaking for themselves. I posted only that, as the nexus/ByzKnight's theory would suggest I did use a night action on you and Renata or someone else might have too, hence you would have been the nexus where this silencing came from Night One. You don't even have proof to deny that, yet your first instinct was to accuse your accuser of being scum on shaky reasoning.
It came from somewhere though, the point being it indicates you were not thinking like a townie. How about this - how about you just explain that then? Are you just an enemy of the "Evil Mafia" faction? Why would you think them or alternatively B_Ray2's team could have up to 8 members? Also, the game rules themselves imply that people on the same "faction" can be of different "alignment" (evil/chaotic). So no, you were in error to assume otherwise and act so shocked when a neutral or cover role came up - or you were intentionally acting scummy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
You also reminded me the scummiest thing of all though. I forgot to post it earlier, but:
Your suggestion on what the "playing cards" did was so out of the ballpark it wasn't even wrong. Some people made guesses that are probably wrong, and that happens, but yours just no way could be taken realistically at face value. Very much looked like a deliberate attempt to be completely distracting, this is one of the scummiest things of all so I really should have posted it earlier but remembered it now.
From my stomach? And whose gonna rez you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Seon
True badass don't need no cleric to bring himself out of his early grave. Why, in my days, we got no clerics! Hell, we didn't even get a first aid kit! No, our entire battalion got a single band-aid. To share.Quote:
Originally Posted by ByzantineKnight
:laugh4: Staph much?Quote:
Originally Posted by Seon
What card theory? That this was a game of strip poker and that I had already taken off my pants? Are we not allowed to joke here? You are seriously saying that was meant to distract from the more serious conversation and take the heat off? Or were you talking about the thought that it might be some sort of poker hand we got?
Hello? Were we not told we could vote on items? Could the cards not be construed as items? Item voting had not yet started when I made this theory and I was quite honestly shocked when cards did not come up for votes on the first day.
I'll tell you where my card-to-faction-member theory came from: Because I have lost a faction mate, and the number on my card matches his. Do all the cards match number sets? No, and we all know it from looking at the write ups. But others know that some DO match because their card matches their dead allies card, I highly doubt that I am some random exception. Nice try, though, getting me to tell you which mafia are my enemy. I will tell you what, I will tell you my enemies if you tell me yours, then even if we are lying we will both be screwed.
And while you're at it, be sure and tell us all what "action" you performed on me. Oh....you probably need to find out from Renata is she performed one and what it was so your entire concocted story makes sense.
You are a really good detective. I am glad you found a voting pattern for me in two days, one during which I did not even vote but -- by all of your accounts -- I should have voted for Renata because she was "so close" to getting lynched after I shot purple x-rays out of my butt and silenced everyone. I am also you have found that I am "anti-town" attitude for suggesting who possible murder targets will be based on them having items like faction scanners, and that I have an anti-town attitude for lambasting people after they lynch a man they should have known was innocent because his main accuser freaking said as much.
And for all this "suspicious" posting that I am doing, you are including a distinct lack of my quotes and in most cases not even bothering to paraphrase, instead opting to simply call my actions "scummy" or "suspicious." You are likley aware that people do not like to go back and read pages and pages of spam and text walling, and hope to oversimplify my guilt with a case that simply does not exist.
For the one thing you think matters but doesn't, I might as well share. It probably doesn't hurt, but it shows how completely irrelevant your point is. I attempted to roleblock you, found out this was not my natural talent, and it should have had no effect at all, but reading things over I did seriously overlook the possibility that this silencing was somehow in retribution. Renata could have attempted any action and the silencing effect could have worked the same way because of sending an order to target you, if that's how it works, so that's why that's not relevant. Now,
My enemies are the chaotics.Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
Your turn.
See, if you're scum you lose major roleplaying points here. If you're going to be all fake angry and sarcastic when you know you're in trouble you actually should drop the character clues. This, this isn't that funny. Going the extra mile to make it great is worth it, if you actually claimed something silly but that really did relate to your character, like if you were scum with a cover role as part of the Star Wars faction or something and "shoot force lightning out of my butt" at least it's lampshading.Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
Oh Earthling. Wow. Just wow. And now I am not funny, either. Now there is a reason to lynch me for sure. I'm certainly glad I have you here to criticize my style and tell me I'm lampshading wrong, whatever that is. By the way, I hate your haircut and you're looking fat these days.
Yes, the actions do matter, because I dare say that a vigilante kill is significantly different than a roleblock. A roleblock would be something that a "block action" action might defeat, whereas a block action would not do anything against an attempted kill, where one would need self defense instead. So, if Renata tried to kill me, then it would make no sense that both of you suffer the same silence result from some sort of blanket affect as the makeup of the actions list indicate that this is a game of rock paper scissors and there are no blanket effects.
I do not believe you that your only enemy is Chaotic, unless you are nuetral.
My enemy are the chaoitics, too!
And two mafia factions.
Funny that you say your enemy is only chaotic. Even funnier is that you want to know how I came to the conclusion about B-Ray, his enemies and faction numbers. B-Ray implicitly stated that, due to a faction scan, YLCs death would serve b-Rays needs. That means B-Ray has something very much in common with me, something you just left out of your enemy claim. Something that I would think a townie would be well aware of, but something someone Chaotic may very well not know, which is why you are so goshdarned confused about where I got my faction numbers from.
You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zack
ELLIPSES! ZACK IS SCUM!Quote:
Originally Posted by Zack
Bet: 3.14159265357989 credits on Zack
Earthing, MRD, can you two please stop text-walling? It's making the thread even more painful to read than it already is.
Just wanted to get this one quoted for record. Just in case, ya know.Quote:
Originally Posted by Earthling
I believe it was WilliamWallace who once consumed the English with fireballs from his eyes, and bolts of lightning from his butt.
Scratch that, it was he who suffered the Wrath Of el Gigante for inactivity in my Dark Falls game.
And when I say B-Ray has something in common with me, I don't mean we are both enemies of the Evil Mafia faction. I mean that I, too, have mafia enemies who are in a different faction than I, and that my goal is to defeat both the chaotics and them. So back the F off of me Evil Mafia, I got no beef with u. Go kill Earthling, since he didn't even know the mafia factions are at war with each other
https://i1110.photobucket.com/albums...g?t=1303707690Quote:
Originally Posted by Choxorn
Hi. Back. Will participate frequentlier.
@ Earthling -- I didn't target MRD last night. If you targeted no one else, then we have no one in common.
It's so fluffy I'm gonna die! I wuv you! :beam:Quote:
Originally Posted by Thefluffyone93
What two factions?Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
Cryptic handshake attempt!
Also, Earthling is giving me headaches. Everything's as it usually is. I am a vampire, etc., and I would be happy if people could use that silence thing every phase please. My head hurts and the pages are so long. I won't hide that I skip Earthling's posts. I have tried reading them like I have tried reading Kafka in Norwegian. It's pretty hard and I give up but I keep telling myself "I'll give it another try later. A lot later."
Cryptic indeed, so cryptic in fact that I am even more confused than before.
Can't we all just swear off night actions, save our money, and chip in to buy a classy strip club that will be a front for a larger, more nefarious business ventures?
I guess the main point of all this discussion is: Should I use my cute pet rabbit to try and chomp someone's hand this night?
It seems likely after all that this is an active scum ability they choose to target people with but given that we caught at least one scum over the fallout that's ok.Quote:
Originally Posted by Renata
Says the guy who didn't even know that mafia factions are at war with other mafia factions.
If anyone wants to practice their defend other skill this night, may I suggest myself as a target? I will obviously have an attempt on my life this evening, and Earthling will probably try to silence me with his butt x-ray.
Who's going to target you?
Surely you have 100 spare credits for a self-defense, or are you telling us you've wasted your credits on other sneaky night actions? :inquisitive:Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
Earthlink and friends. I was already targeted twice on night 1, a murder attempt and a roleblock attempt. Now that Earthlink has made a case against me that is full of holes and misinformation, and it is clear to other townies that I am townie and he is likely not, then he and his team/faction will try to kill or silence me.
I have plenty of credits. What I don't have is the ability to both effectively defend and effectively block action. I will trade defensive acts for item votes, thats all I can offer. Someone should scan me and Earthlink while they are at it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArpeggiateTHIS
See, you're almost certainly lying. It's obvious you're lying too, about basic things of your own identity, not even counting all the times you've lied about what I said. If it's what you're claiming, it's totally not a townie thing that you get to find out what night actions other people are using on you even if those actions don't succeed.
And in general I (probably all of us) would like to hear from whomever tried to vig him if someone even did and he didn't make that up. And that's mostly just that he's a very good candidate for actually being scum, even though he might try to get me killed somehow too but I might as well ignore that.
That's where you are wrong. The only "action" I claimed to have known about was my attempted murder. The rules state that failed attempts most likley will not get a thread write up. The rules say nothing about a player not being alerted as to his own near miss, especially if that near miss, for example, included the use of an item, or, perhaps, was due to a free "experimenation" action which resulted in learning said trait. If someone didn't try to kill a brother, then how would a brother have gotten the self defense special ability bonus? If someone didn't try to steal from a brother, then how would a brother have gotten the resist steal trait?Quote:
Originally Posted by Earthling
Look, Earthlink, just admit that you butt-xrayed Renata and almost got her lynched. It's not the end of the world, and your fellow Chaotics will probably defend you tonight. And I'm sure the guy who tried to Vig me will totally stand up and admit to it. totally. Oh wait, he can't, because of my uber-defensive butt xray not only silenced him, but also shorted his monitor and made his wife fall down teh stairz.
@Earthling & Renata: Could you speak privately when you were silenced? What were exactly all the restrictions you were under?
1. No talking in thread.
2. No PMs
3. No chat.
4. No vote.
5. Images or smilies were allowed.
6. Quoting other players in order to respond to their comments with images or smilies was not allowed. (This was the cause of my deleted posts.)
It took me a while to get it all straightened out. At first I thought PMs might be allowed, and asked about that, but that got shot down. Then I was told about the images, but after I tried to use them to assemble some fashion of actual comments, I was asked to remove the quotes.
So if anyone tried this on fluffy, he'd be just fine?Quote:
Originally Posted by Renata
No, fluffy's images mostly have text. That's a no-no.
Sorry, fluffy.
How were you told about being silenced?
Was it a plain "you are silenced", or did you get a clue how it happened?
Please note, all:
I have a long shift tonight and I won't be back before 0100, and it takes up to 4 hours to assemble all your orders, add/remove credits, calculate results, send out result PMs, and write the night writeup.
There will be a delay, however I will not accept new orders past 0100, because it's been 2 days as it stands, and I'll be busy calculating results.
LISTEN TO THIS CSI SHIZZLE
Page 13, post 366. Earthlink claims that he and at least one other person (and probably more) has been silenced, before anyone else claims to have been silenced. A mighty assumption on his part in a game where 20% of the players did not post on day 1 or 2. He claims that Renata was the other person well before Renata ever says so.
What really happened is that Earthlink used his butt x-ray on Renata and deicided to play the victim, too, knowing that if she got lynched she would be unable to talk about it afterwards and people would have missed his presence on the 2nd day. He did not post smileys or images like Renata did because he did not know it was okay, not until Renata did it, and he complained to the host that she was posting, and ATPG sent him a PM saying it was allowed. Well, Renata didn't die, and so Earthlink needed to blame someone for all of the silencings, so he picked a guy who had already stated that someone had attempted to touch his no-no the night before, and accused him of having the butt x-ray. That guy was me.
When the butt x-ray comes up for item vote, I will gladly vote this item to someone else, because it has already brought me enough grief. Much like the magical ring from that movie where the elves and yodas fight over the ring whilst eating potatoes, I fear such an item will only turn its holder into a terrible person who will use the butt x-ray for his or her own personal gain against everyone and anyone, except pregnant or nursing women of course.
I wouldn't advise it. That thing's only got a 10% success rate and evidently there's plenty of retaliation powers out there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolt
And Major Dump, his name is Earthling. Earthlink is a defunct internet service provider.
No.
Thanks for the tip, though, B_Rag. I am glad I am not in the Evil Mafia, because then I would be one of your competitors and you would try to kill me. Hopefully, the real members of the Evil Mafia do not read this thread or else they may come after you for admitting that YLC of the Evil Mafia was your enemy, info you got from a scan your dead character performed which you should never have shared to begin with. Better get yourself a butt x-ray.
To a certain extent. I don't want to run afoul of the paraphrasing rules, so I'll just summarize:Quote:
Originally Posted by Romanic
-- it was something that happened during the night
-- it was something that was done to me
-- I was told up front that I would not be able to speak or vote during the day; the rest I had to get clarified in separate PMs
-- the direct agency is not clear (that is, Earthling's hypothesis that it was due to something each of us did (rather than something multiple people did to us) is not wrong on its face, however unlikely I think it might be)
That's very possible, but it may also be that Earthling saw the two deleted posts and Renata's pictures/smilies - after that it won't be too difficult to put two and two together, since he would be affected by the same conditions and would have no doubt asked ATPG before/after seeing those posts. Your conclusion makes sense, but is perhaps too complicated, Occam's Razor applies here maybe?Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
Edit: After reading through the last pages, I think you theory can apply to Renata as well, who (from what I read) is very good mafia player and can pull off such a trick, whilst I'm assuming Earthling is quite new to this (though maybe he played at CFC?)
Also....I want to ask Subotan why he started the 20 credit wager on YLC, as it seems a tad too much just to pressure a lurker (and so I voted with him, assuming that he actually has a credible reason for doing so).
I don't think that Earthling is making it up.
Linkie.
That's Earthling's first post after nightfall. He reads my image post correctly, and also mentions that he'd just gotten/read (seems to be an edit error there) a PM saying that images were allowed. ATPG only clarified that with me 24 hours or so *after* the day had begun; it makes sense that, had anyone else been the victim of the same power, they'd have also gotten an "oh by the way" heads-up from ATPG on that point at the same time. Earthling is clearly implying at least two different PMs, which makes a great deal of sense if he was a silencing victim and not a whole lot if he was the one doing the silencing.
It's ok, I'm fine with being a troll instead of a victim.Quote:
Originally Posted by Renata
Edit: I believe Major was trying to insinuate something in his last post......
Or he really likes the color green.
How bizarre.
Agh, this back and forth between Earthling and Major is making me head hurt. At this point, I'm inclined to say they both are innocent. As usual, I am being completely out of the loop, not being able to find any threads that are sufficiently thick enough for me to condemn someone to death.
Does asking what the heck this thing is make me look stupid? (Note: even if it does, can somebody enlighten me?)Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
I think he's just trying to be an :daisy: to Earthling.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArpeggiateTHIS
HELLO DO YOU PPL NOT KNOW THE BUTT X-RAY IS THE BIGGEST THREAT TO MAFIOSO SINCE KEVIN COSTNER AS ELLIOT NESS? THIS IS NO JOKE PPL IT SILENCES THE UNSILENCABLES, IT TURNS THE PWNER INTO THE PWNT, IT TURNS THE RACKETEER INTO THE RACKETEED. THIS THING IS NO LAUGHING JOKE MATTER AT ALL
:laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
EDIT: If its such a big threat to mafioso then why is it such a bad thing?
This man, I love him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
There are not many times the Org has made me LOL. This is one of them. Kudos, good sir.Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
Where is everybody?
No more orders accepted. This round may last until tonight, because they made me close, then open in about 9 hours. Not kewl, man. I can't spend 4 of them working on this game.