Forum Index

[Quietus]

Yes, I read all of it. What I meant, as you well know, is that I was not going to read and comment on that section at the time. It may astound you, but I do have other things to do with my time other than give you corrections for your guide. I had to expend a fair amount of time collating and confirming my comments as it was. I also notice that a substantial part of your revisions/corrections are based on my recommendations.

I'm pretty sure finishing a sentence won't take you hours.

So now, after going round the barn, we get to the point. Your guide is, IMHO, for advanced players. frogbeastegg's is better for beginners and intermediate players. This is why I suggest that players should read frogbeastegg's first.

Now we get to the barn again. Is it really that difficulty for you tell spell out in your own words "advanced", "beginners" and "Intermediate"?What part of this:

frogbeastegg's Guide to Rome: Total War - the guide to Rome: Total War. If you only read one guide, it should be this one!

is not clear to you?

[quote=I have read both guides thoroughly, and have suggested additions to each. The difference between the two is that frogbeastegg's is being revised from a previous form; your guide is still emerging. When the guide was completed, the developing would have been removed. Perhaps the word choice was poor, but developing is not an aspersion. I call my Forum FAQ emerging, despite it being by far the most comprehensive forum guide available. Why? Because it isn't finished, not because I think it is not worthy or useful.[/quote] Apparently you haven't read mine either.

A Comprehensive Rome: Total War Guide: A guide dealing with the Single Player Campaign of Rome: Total War. Reference: Patched to v1.2, Brutii, VH/VH. This is a major revision of my Quick Strategic Map Guide & Primer to RTW and A Quick Economics Guide & Primer to RTW, along with additions of A Quick Battle Map Guide & Primer to RTW and Introduction sections. (The revisions and new portions are yet to be fully completed as planned).

Mine is not being revised as well? I thought you said you read it?

The description is blank because you objected to my description, despite it being accurate. To be honest, I couldn't think of anything you would find acceptable, given your reaction to my previous description. So I left it with your self-explanatory title for now, whilst I PMed you for a description you would find acceptable.

I am not trying to belittle your efforts. I think perhaps you should cool off a little, and try not to see the worst in everything I type.

The fact the sentence wasn't even finished is not a description.

Quietus's A Comprehensive Rome: Total War Guide - a developing guide to all aspect of

You call that a description?

LOL. The fact that you put it at the very bottom is not any indication.

I'm just glad I've straightened this out. Or else the readers would have been wickedly misled. Last time I checked, my Quick Economics Guide was kept in Ludus Magna for months (It should have been in the Guides section). Whoever moderator was supposed to move it didn't.