Results 1 to 30 of 61

Thread: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member Koga No Goshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA.
    Posts
    2,596

    Default Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    This is a hypothetical question for anti-abortion people.

    Let's assume that we pass a law which recognizes the full rights of fetuses as human beings from the moment of conception. At that moment any form of abortion or abortive procedures or attempts is considered illegal, or a form of murder.

    Does that mean that if a foreign national, visiting the United States, becomes pregnant and can verify that conception occurred during the time she was in the U.S., that her child, having full human rights under U.S. law, is entitled to citizenship?

    Have at it..
    Koga no Goshi

    I give my Nihon Maru to TosaInu in tribute.

  2. #2
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    I don't see why. All people in the US should have rights, but that doesn't mean they automatically get citizenship.

    CR
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

  3. #3
    Member Member Koga No Goshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA.
    Posts
    2,596

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit View Post
    I don't see why. All people in the US should have rights, but that doesn't mean they automatically get citizenship.

    CR
    One of those rights is that if you are born here you are a citizen.
    Koga no Goshi

    I give my Nihon Maru to TosaInu in tribute.

  4. #4
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Koga No Goshi View Post
    One of those rights is that if you are born here you are a citizen.
    If you are born there, not if you are conceived there. Even if the unborn child has equal rights, existing law does not entitle it to citizenship.

  5. #5
    Member Member Koga No Goshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA.
    Posts
    2,596

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars View Post
    If you are born there, not if you are conceived there. Even if the unborn child has equal rights, existing law does not entitle it to citizenship.
    Existing law does not recognize a fetus as a human with full human rights, either. So if we CHANGE that from BIRTH to CONCEPTION, does it or does it not pose a logical inconsistency for some rights to be gained at birth and others at conception under U.S. law? Or, should ALL present law that confers rights at BIRTH (such as full human rights and citizenship) be moved to the moment of conception?

    And in both cases we are talking about rights that qualify your existence in the eyes of the United States, so I do consider them related. The law recognizing you as a full citizen simply because you popped out at a U.S. hospital, vs. the law recognizing your full human rights when sperm fertilizes an egg. Contradiction? Not a contradiction?
    Last edited by Koga No Goshi; 09-25-2008 at 03:52.
    Koga no Goshi

    I give my Nihon Maru to TosaInu in tribute.

  6. #6
    Nobody expects the Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin Death Trip
    Posts
    15,754

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Well, yeah, changing the definition of "full human rights" status in such a major way would create a huge thicket of legal issues. That's why we have lawyers and judges and cases to sort these things out. The law does not exist in some philosophical vacuum, it has to function in the real world. Going back to the opening post: the obvious answer would be to base citizenship on birth, not conception. The moment when ovum meets sperm is just too damn hard to prove.

    Just because a blastocyst has the protections of a full human being does not mean that every other right and responsibility must be conferred at the same moment. Children are protected by many laws, but we don't let them vote. Does this make sense to you?

  7. #7
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Koga No Goshi View Post
    Existing law does not recognize a fetus as a human with full human rights, either. So if we CHANGE that from BIRTH to CONCEPTION, does it or does it not pose a logical inconsistency for some rights to be gained at birth and others at conception under U.S. law? Or, should ALL present law that confers rights at BIRTH (such as full human rights and citizenship) be moved to the moment of conception?
    The right to live from conception - more rights at birth, and all rights at the age of adulthood. The youth don't have the right to vote, so according to your logic, we already have a logical inconsistency - unless, of course, you want infant suffrage.

    And in both cases we are talking about rights that qualify your existence in the eyes of the United States, so I do consider them related. The law recognizing you as a full citizen simply because you popped out at a U.S. hospital, vs. the law recognizing your full human rights when sperm fertilizes an egg. Contradiction? Not a contradiction?
    You cannot always tell where you were when conception occured, but I think it's fairly obvious where the birth happened. No, the fetus has the right to life. It does not yet have the right to citizenship.

    EDIT: Plus what CR said.
    Last edited by Evil_Maniac From Mars; 09-25-2008 at 04:03.

  8. #8
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    I'd say a more important question is; will we charge women with a miscarriage for murder?
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  9. #9
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default Re : Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    I'd say a more important question is; will we charge women with a miscarriage for murder?
    Well, possibly, if she's been riding on galloping horses for days on end.
    Maybe we should lock pregnant women up preventively!

    Speaking of which, what of imprisonment? Surely, an unborn child should not spend months in prison simply because its mother broke the law?


    Likewise, for the baby murdering pro-choicers: what if an eight-month pregnant women is stabbed in the stomach and loses her baby? Is it just a lump of cells that's lost? Or can the stabber be charged with homicide?
    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  10. #10
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    I'd say a more important question is; will we charge women with a miscarriage for murder?
    For taking the morning after pill? I'd say no, though there are sure to be those who disagree with me. For forcibly trying to induce a miscarriage during the pregnancy after the time to take the morning after pill has passed? Perhaps. They could either be charged under the laws preventing abortion (since inducing miscarriage is basically an abortion) or under the murder laws, whichever is appropriate.

  11. #11
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Koga No Goshi View Post
    One of those rights is that if you are born here you are a citizen.
    And I don't agree with that. And being born is different from being conceived. It doesn't pose any logical inconsistency; it just seems you're trying some odd new pro-abortion argument.

    CR
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

  12. #12
    Oni Member Samurai Waki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Portland, Ore.
    Posts
    3,925
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Or as Mr. Spock would say: "This query implies an illogical solution"

  13. #13
    Member Member Koga No Goshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA.
    Posts
    2,596

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit View Post
    And I don't agree with that. And being born is different from being conceived. It doesn't pose any logical inconsistency; it just seems you're trying some odd new pro-abortion argument.

    CR
    Let's not start calling out the motivations in each other's closets when we don't know each other, shall we? This is an intellectual exercise, nothing more. Abortion is legal and I do not consider that likely to change; the anti-abortion movement has had 8 years of almost complete control of the branches of government and from a political viewpoint it's fairly obvious that the GOP chooses to use that as a wedge issue and to energize its base, and will probably never actually go through with it. BUt this is neither here nor there. I feel no compelling desire to "dredge up an old pro abortion argument"; I'm pro choice but so is the majority of this country and so are our laws. So let's just keep it civil and in the realm of theoretical yes?
    Koga no Goshi

    I give my Nihon Maru to TosaInu in tribute.

  14. #14
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Koga No Goshi View Post
    Let's not start calling out the motivations in each other's closets when we don't know each other, shall we? ..... etc.
    As Lemur put it, you can have human rights without such rights as the right to vote. Society has long held that many rights come upon reaching the age of majority.

    And I oppose anchor-babies as well, so perhaps you could point out any "logical inconsistencies".

    CR
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

  15. #15
    Nobody expects the Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin Death Trip
    Posts
    15,754

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    You would need to differentiate between when a multi-cellular structure becomes human (answer: at conception) and when it is born. Since the actual date of conception would be hard to prove, I would imagine that most legal consequences would derive from the date of birth, not from the necessarily fuzzier date of conception.

  16. #16
    Member Member Koga No Goshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA.
    Posts
    2,596

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemur View Post
    You would need to differentiate between when a multi-cellular structure becomes human (answer: at conception) and when it is born. Since the actual date of conception would be hard to prove, I would imagine that most legal consequences would derive from the date of birth, not from the necessarily fuzzier date of conception.
    We're not assuming that we're 50 years down the road and there are already established laws about it. We're assuming everything else remains the same except a law is passed recognizing FULL HUMAN RIGHTS at the moment of conception as a means of criminalizing and banning abortion in the U.S.

    So, imagine whatever context works... a challenge at the Supreme Court by a woman who was here for three months and her conception was DEFINITELY while she was in the U.S., or whatever.

    Sorry if I seem to be changing the rules. I am asking for a logical reasoning as to why it should, or should not, confer benefits of citizenship if it confers recognition of complete human rights at the moment of conception. Rather than "well what I think they would do is.."
    Koga no Goshi

    I give my Nihon Maru to TosaInu in tribute.

  17. #17
    This comment is witty! Senior Member LittleGrizzly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    The wilderness...
    Posts
    9,215

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Since the actual date of conception would be hard to prove, I would imagine that most legal consequences would derive from the date of birth, not from the necessarily fuzzier date of conception.

    I think whatshe's getting at with the hypothetical is that if they are humans from birth then they have certain rights.... like citizenship, also another hypothetical would an american woman be banned from going abroad for an abortion (because she's going away to kill a human) and would a tourist be banned from going home if she was going to abort her baby ?
    In remembrance of our great Admin Tosa Inu, A tireless worker with the patience of a saint. As long as I live I will not forget you. Thank you for everything!

  18. #18
    Member Member Koga No Goshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA.
    Posts
    2,596

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by LittleGrizzly View Post
    Since the actual date of conception would be hard to prove, I would imagine that most legal consequences would derive from the date of birth, not from the necessarily fuzzier date of conception.

    I think whatshe's getting at with the hypothetical is that if they are humans from birth then they have certain rights.... like citizenship, also another hypothetical would an american woman be banned from going abroad for an abortion (because she's going away to kill a human) and would a tourist be banned from going home if she was going to abort her baby ?
    This is a good one too, would a woman coming back to the U.S. after an abortion be chargeable with murder? But it perhaps is another topic. :)
    Koga no Goshi

    I give my Nihon Maru to TosaInu in tribute.

  19. #19
    Banned Kadagar_AV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    In average 2000m above sea level.
    Posts
    4,176

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Koga No Goshi View Post
    This is a good one too, would a woman coming back to the U.S. after an abortion be chargeable with murder? But it perhaps is another topic. :)
    Just a quick answer, nope.

    Only is she had the abortion in the US. You are only required to follow the law in the country you are in when the thing occurs.

    Meaning, even if abortion was illegal in the states, US citizens woudl still have the right to make an abortion in another country and then come back, without them being prosecuted.

    This is the way national and international laws work.

    As an example, as a swede I can have sex with 15 year old girls... Legal age in Sweden is 15. So, if I went to the US, They wouldnt be able to put me in jail for it. Americans who come to sweden can also ahve sex with 15 yo girls (or boys).

    Also, US citizsens are free to go to Amsterdam and smoke weed, as much as they want to, as they follow netherlands laws...

    Just a sidenote:)
    Last edited by Kadagar_AV; 09-25-2008 at 13:12.

  20. #20
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default Re : Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Koga No Goshi View Post
    This is a hypothetical question for anti-abortion people.

    Let's assume that we pass a law which recognizes the full rights of fetuses as human beings from the moment of conception. At that moment any form of abortion or abortive procedures or attempts is considered illegal, or a form of murder.

    Does that mean that if a foreign national, visiting the United States, becomes pregnant and can verify that conception occurred during the time she was in the U.S., that her child, having full human rights under U.S. law, is entitled to citizenship?
    Why, of course it is entitled to citizenship. To be precise: the fetus is entitled to the exact same rights to citizenship as newborns. The answer to the hypothetical question in paragraph three has been given in paragraph two.
    If a hypothetical law is passed that recognizes the full rights of fetuses as human beings from the moment of conception, then that's that really. Nothing to it. This poses no dilemmas, paradoxes, or possible inconsistensies to anti-abortionists. On the contrary, they have just been pre-emptively solved.


    The difficult question to ask anti-abortion people is: if the moment of conception marks the birth of a human being, then shouldn't an embryo be granted full rights as human beings? This then, will have some serious consequences, and even dilemmas and inconsistensies. (And it is about these that CR shared some of his thoughts). Like, for example, that of anchor conception.

    The same concept poses a mirrored and reversed dilemma for pro-choicers. For example, in inheritance law (depending on jurisdiction, of course) inheritances can be transferred to the unborn. That is, they enjoy rights as if they were living. The same dilemma applies, and the question to pro-choicers is: if the moment of birth marks the beginning of a human being, then shouldn't an embryo be excluded from rights? If you grant embryos the right to property, then why not the more important right to life?
    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  21. #21
    Member Member KrooK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Kraj skrzydlatych jeźdźców
    Posts
    1,083

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Why not ? :) Children would be US citizen.
    US citizenship is nothing so great:) And if you want avoid this problem you can simply....
    chose another way of becoming citizen - US citizen is person born from US citizen or citizens.
    John Thomas Gross - liar who want put on Poles responsibility for impassivity of American Jews during holocaust

  22. #22

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by KrooK View Post
    \US citizenship is nothing so great :)
    Your "America sucks" smilies always appear green to me...

  23. #23
    Member Member KrooK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Kraj skrzydlatych jeźdźców
    Posts
    1,083

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Sorry Jaeger but for member of EU its really nothing great.
    Maybe for someone from really poor countries but not for EU, Norway, Switzerland, Iceland.
    John Thomas Gross - liar who want put on Poles responsibility for impassivity of American Jews during holocaust

  24. #24
    Member Member Koga No Goshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA.
    Posts
    2,596

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    It is true that America's standing in the eyes of the world is no longer so unquestionably high as it used to be. Whereas 30 years ago immigrants badly wanted to come to the U.S. and raise their kids here, it's really only true in certain cases now like China, Latin America, etc. When you talk to Canadians, Europeans or Australians or Japanese, a lot of them don't want to raise kids in the U.S. anymore. From a quality of life and opportunity perspective we have fallen behind and there is no longer any marked advantage to doing so here as opposed to other places. (Safety is also a concern for many people I've spoken to who say they'd rather move back to Sweden/insert home country when they have kids.)
    Koga no Goshi

    I give my Nihon Maru to TosaInu in tribute.

  25. #25
    Master of Few Words Senior Member KukriKhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,415

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Louis
    The difficult question to ask anti-abortion people is: if the moment of conception marks the birth of a human being, then shouldn't an embryo be granted full rights as human beings? This then, will have some serious consequences, and even dilemmas and inconsistensies.
    Various laws in various North American Jurisdictions have been passed that confer, if not full citizenship or human rights, at least the "protection of the law", on the unborn. A quick Google reveals:

    Canada

    Pennsylvania

    Missouri

    Arkansas

    So, although it may not yet be the Federal law of the land, various jurisdictions with the right to rule what constitutes murder, have therefore also implicitly ruled when in life the protection of government is mandatory.

    I agree that the issue will appear on the SCOTUS schedule someday - probably within 10 years. Some guy on death row for killing an unborn child, but not the mother, will appeal.
    Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.

  26. #26
    Old Town Road Senior Member Strike For The South's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Between Louis' sheets
    Posts
    10,369

    Default Re: Anti-Abortion Hypothetical Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Koga No Goshi View Post
    It is true that America's standing in the eyes of the world is no longer so unquestionably high as it used to be. Whereas 30 years ago immigrants badly wanted to come to the U.S. and raise their kids here, it's really only true in certain cases now like China, Latin America, etc. When you talk to Canadians, Europeans or Australians or Japanese, a lot of them don't want to raise kids in the U.S. anymore. From a quality of life and opportunity perspective we have fallen behind and there is no longer any marked advantage to doing so here as opposed to other places. (Safety is also a concern for many people I've spoken to who say they'd rather move back to Sweden/insert home country when they have kids.)
    This is why we have more foreign born people than anyone else in the world right? because Americas so bad! Are there countries comparable to the US in allot of things? yes. Do some countries do things better? hell yes. But what America stands for and what America means to the mexican or to the African or the Chinese man when he steps of the boat is the same thing it meant for the Italian, Czech and jewish immigrant 100 years ago and the German Irish and English immigrant 200 years ago. Very few countries are so intertwined with an idea. America is a symbol of hope and that if work hard enough there is no limit to what you can do. Americas greatest strength is the fact that people from all over the wrold came here to better themselves. They believed in what this country stood for. That is what makes America unique the fact that diversity does not weaken us but makes us stronger.
    There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford

    My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.

    I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO