A book published in November of 2010 is obsolete? That is quite a hurdle, indeed.
You mean 2004?EDIT: holy moly, these articles are truly Old. with the latest one being in 2001, no You really should go back to these books you mentioned, with real evidence this time. Yallah i'm waiting![]()
Like Foreign Affairs?EDIT2: No sorry, besides the quotes, the links themselves lead to known neocon think tank organizations, Freedom House, and Middle East Quarterly in particular. Already discredited in proper discourse. Can you try something really academic and reputable this time?
Obviously calling into question the age and sources of the articles instead of their content is a well established tactic of obfuscation, but it does highlight an interesting issue. It was in fact the NeoCons who believed most strongly in the ability of the the Arab peoples to embrace democracy - so I am not sure what bearing that has on the credibility of articles published by supposedly NeoCon influenced organizations that suggest the opposite.![]()
Bookmarks