in further review you are right, this adds nothing to the debate so i rescind my statement. However he still needs to make a credible argument for the books he linked earlier, instead of linking me a bunch of websites, on the grounds that they must be Academic, Peer reviewed, and probably non-aligned (i.e not bought science), maybe i'll take him more seriously then, becuase what he linked has already be debunked actually through media and literature, which i'm too lazy to repaste here cause it involves mostly Slavoj Zizek, an actual relevant philosopher, and a whole buttload of other books that escape my mind right now.
Bookmarks