Well, firstly it's worth summarizing that TLD is a good suspect on his own for defending GE, the first day's bandwagon, and general scummy comments. Part of it is that Believer, like others, has a case against him for this and Believer did say he was suspicious of TLD before.

As for the rest, it seems to me it's arguing he said-she said about whatever they discussed in private.

Believer claims he voiced suspicions about TLD to other people. TLD supposedly had been telling people in private to "trust nobody." TLD claims Believer was trying to butter him up and get him to follow his votes and now decided to betray him. Some of the other parties supposedly involved weighed in, about what either TLD or Believer was saying.

In the absence of real solid evidence like a scan this seems like a good case for today, though I can't exactly stop people from voting Double A or glyphz instead, at least if we get more people voting the voting record will still be useful in the long run.