Quote Originally Posted by -Stormrage- View Post
OP ? if something is good at what it is supposed to do it is not OP. And i thought u ugys were all about Historical accuracy well the falx was historically good at doing what it does "OP" as u call it. everytime i suggest somehting someone tells me "oh no sotrmrage but that is not historically accurate we dont care if its good for gameplay its not historical" . you guys are all . History is NUMBER 1 historocal accuracy is NUMBER 1. Why are you now hiding behind the banner of "for gameplay puposes" . EB isnt about fair gameplay its about historical accuracy, according to you.
Eb is about both, its about making a game as historically accurate, ballanced and fun to play as is possible with the RTW engine. So you have to find a compromise. If you want to play a game that drop the historicaly accurate part, why dont you go play another mod, there's lot of good ones? I was saying that falxes being historically good agaisnt armour doesnt mean that you can't ballance them without the game attribute AP. That, for the sake of gameplay, game AP isnt the same as historicaly AP. Unless you want to decrase falx letallity? Indian archers in vanilla were OP in vanilla because they could kick the ass out even of catas!