Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
If you can find a way to keep only the "bad" immigrants out, while letting all the "good" ones in, I'll be your campaign manager, believe me.

As such a thing seems impossible, however, I see absolutely no reason whatsoever to keep the many responsible for the actions of the few.

As an illustration of how ridiculous IA's emotional appeal is, consider the alternative version. Find a happy family, preferably with half a dozen children, where one parents is a native and the other an immigrant. Take a picture of the children with eyes like only innocent children can have, and add a text underneath that goes something along the lines of this:

"If you restrict immigration, my mommy and poppy would never have found love and happiness. I would not exist. Why, Mr. right-winger, don't you want children like me to be born and live a happy life?"

In short, a really, really low cheap shot.
This isn't about keeping people out, it's about what we do with them when they get here - and the side issue of whether they should be allowed to stay.

These men saw a fundamental difference between white girls and girls of their own ethnic/religious group. Worse, the group they single out is the native one which implies something about the way they see the rest of us.

This is a problem of lack of integration - while the white majority is encouraged to see everyone without regard to race or creed the minority groups coming in look down on our children because they are white.

These immigrants are inherrently racist - and I doubt the perverts are the only ones, just the most exploitative.

That is the problem.

Having said all that, we could restrict immigration based on economic circumstances - if your country's economy is in the toilet and you are coming over here to be a waiter, no dice, we don't need to import kitchen staff. On the other hand, if you're coming over to be a software engineer or a surgeon, or a chemist - please, feel welcome.