Quote Originally Posted by Montmorency View Post
Could you please elaborate, Horetore?



Henry Ford's focus on always increasing employee wages is what the workers movement was about. Ford didn't believe in unions, but that's because he believed his style of industrialism would become dominant; and in Ford's companies, there really is no need for a union. However, since Ford was wrong about what other industrialists do, unions are(unfortunately) needed.

Also, I second what rory says. Unions in "socialist business-hate"-land means a three-party partnership between the state, the workers union and the employers union(yes, employers also need to unionize). All three parties share several interests, but if things doesn't resolve itself, then the state can cut through and force a binding agreement between the two.