so i provide multiple historical writings for my idea of jesus, he was real and thought to have been crucified and messiah and majority of writings son of god. You provide what you admit to have no evidence for, yet than amazingly claim
"Contemporary and empirical evidence would show that my theory is more PLAUSIBLE though".
i care not and dont know how to debate with this logic.
I also hate communist
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...ism&highlight=
i used even the most radical liberal scholars,to show all agree jesus was a real man that lived and died under pilate.
Bookmarks