responding to common objections to bible part 4

[Kadagar_AV]

oh sorry,so you than do accept jesus was a real man,but reject what the writers of the time said he was. I dont care to try and make someone accept who he is that is their choice to accept what was written of him or not. You believe his mom committed adultery etc that is fine, not based on any evidence [your worldview] but fine, it shows historical writings dont mean a thing,this thread is not about what your asking anywho.

If I would believe all sources from 2000 years ago, we would have SO SO SO many gods.

Can you explain why I should believe in yours specifically?

so i provide multiple historical writings for my idea of jesus, he was real and thought to have been crucified and messiah and majority of writings son of god. You provide what you admit to have no evidence for, yet than amazingly claim

"Contemporary and empirical evidence would show that my theory is more PLAUSIBLE though".


i care not and dont know how to debate with this logic.


I also hate communist
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...ism&highlight=


i used even the most radical liberal scholars,to show all agree jesus was a real man that lived and died under pilate.

Let me guess, you aren't exactly a top grad student?

Can you tell the difference between historical writings and evidence?

And as a PS: The communist thing was just to show your lack of intelligent communication. You can not tell our jokes from statements... Kind of makes me think you cant tell historical jokes from facts either.

With that said, you STILL havent explained your communistic ties.