This makes assumptions about the victims that might not be correct. Ultimately, no action is 100% indiscriminate with regards to its victims (most killers have people they do not want to kill). If the regime casts the net sufficiently wide when trying to catch 'political opponents', their approach can be said to be indiscriminate.
Ultimately, though, the point is that people who have done nothing wrong, and who might not in any way have expected that the regime would imprison them, might end up dead thanks to the security services.
Things don't ever get proved; all one ever have is evidence that point in certain directions.Something has been proved when a relevant impartial authority makes that decision based on all available evidence. Evidence itself is neutral. So far, only thing that has been proved is that prisoners were fed beef.
What a pity.I can't. That's why I said it makes no sense.
Bookmarks