Quote Originally Posted by Gilrandir View Post
I was not talking of any point , still less of any worldview. I was pointing to the inadequacy of terminology to use in any debates on any points.
The terms I used are sufficient to demonstrate my original point, they don't need to have any further utility than that.

You can't use any actually number when discussing infinity, you can only make vague comparisons.

When I called it the way I did, I did so not because of any methods philosophy uses, but because in 2500 years it has failed to produce any tangible results of its "researches". We still are not sure what was primary - the mind or the matter. And what exasperates me more, is that one can't PROVE anything and never will. So when one starts any philosophical carreer one is already sure he will reveal nothing to the world. Hence, pseudoscience.
Well, you don't have to spend your life studying it, but you should take not of philosophy. Most especially you should take note of the essential point that, as you say, we cannot actually prove anything.

The same is true of science - because all science is based on unprovable a priori assumptions.