Quote Originally Posted by Fragony View Post
If I am a bigot than so are the childles mutti's own party-members, who to put it mildly, don't exactly agree with her immigration policy.
It is possible to disagree with immigration and not be a bigot.

I have always been a bigot youknow,
No you weren't. You had a very tough stance on immigration, but you weren't always a bigot.

Quote Originally Posted by Myth View Post
Yeah? Families, fleeing, the same old sob story:

"In Europe, over 800,000 migrants have traveled to Europe by sea in 2015, according to the United Nations refugee agency, and a little over half have come from Syria. About 62% of all migrants that have traveled to Europe this year, however, are men. A little under a quarter, 22%, are children and only 16% are women."
So? It is quite normal for men to travel ahead of the their families, especially if the road is hard and dangerous. Once they get set up, they arrange a safe transport of their families.

And what has that got to do with anything? If it were 40% men, you would've been ok with it?
Removing the syrians from the equasion (where there is an actual legitimate reason for people to flee), you are left with Algerians, Morrocans, tunisians, Afghans and the like. And most of those are men.
Really? You think Afghanistan is safe?
What about Iraq?

Are they peaceful, humble men who keep a low profile and are grateful for the asylum they've been given? No. They organize themselves in barbaric throngs and harrass and rape western women. The more vocal ones who speak english go and protest, demanding sharia law, halal meat in the cafeterias and burqas for the women so they don't disrupt their delicate self control.
Really? Cologne again? First hand knowledge from Facebook? So far two perpetrators have been identified, and neither is a refugee. And they're being charged with stealing cameras from the store. Let's wait a bit before we assign blame.

If you remove the rapes and murders commited by ethnic minorities and immigrants in Sweden, you would get a drastiaclly different picture. Heck, just remove Malmo and the equasion is different.
Really? Then how come Scotland has higher rates of violent crimes than England, and much less immigrants?

In general, if you had bother to look, you would see that it is connected again with poverty. Rich Muslim countries tend to have extremely low rates of violent crimes.

It's about poverty, not race or religion.

Who were the gropers and assaulters on NYE in Cologne? Were they nazis? Skinheads? Proud aryan men preying on their own women? No. They were "migrants" and second and third generation "migrants" who have not integrated into their host society but instead cause trouble without providing anything meaningful in return.
Let's wait on that. So far, we have social network hysteria and little else to go on.

It's about time liberals stopped tip toeing around race and religon issues and start calling things as they are.
I don't think I've been tip toeing at all.