Quote Originally Posted by Sarmatian View Post
What's there to address? After the first part you agreed that the number of immigrants who become criminals is minute, which isn't something I disagree with.

In the second part you mention a few instances of the system failing. I've never argued that it was perfect, but like with all other systems, efforts should be taken to minimize the flaws, not simply shut it all down.
Do note that the over representation after adjusting for socio-economic factors is often more than 4 times as high within the immigrant group as a whole, and that native Swedes are a minority (!) in our jails. The employement figures for refugees is that after 8 years only 25% of them are full-time employed. It puts a massive strain on an extensive welfare state like Sweden which is primarily supported by the notion that people who can work will work to help provide a good life for those who cannot work. Not for those who will not work. Add to this that a large portion of our welfare system is highly accessible even for people who are in the country illegally.

It is not a mention of "a few systems failing" it is a system nearing and in some cases jumping over the breaking point. Criminal gangs roaming on our major streets without the police being able to stop them is not a minor issue of systems failure, nor is the massive waste of tax money throughout the refugee system (for example due to there not being enough homes that the municipalities have available they have to contract private companies for 2-3x the cost if it had been done by the municipality). This is not even mentioning the extra 800,000 people who will get Malaria, TB or AIDS thanks to us cutting our foreign aid including already pledged donations to NGOs, and a further 20,000 dead from these diseases. We spend more on the processing and intake of refugees in a year than the entire UN refugee budget!

Lastly, it is common courtesy to respond to an answer to a question which you have posed.