IMMIGRATION thread

[Lizardo]

Ok yes its good to know the person in contrary to you citation of the book Russia arch enemy entitles to me to envoke dont judge the book by its cover in the antrhopomorthic sense as well. So you like to attack the personality not the message, Ok and russian Regime haa like the undemocratic Coup in money pit Ukraine run by neo nazis and EU shills. And Defense of Stalin in what context and regard?? I think he was harkening to the idea that Russia shouldn't repent for its past if that is so thats abhorrent to you. At first you claimed to know nothing of the individual.
In this article the title below explains it properly he defends stalin in his statements and the creation of stalins gold ruble after the fall of soviet union it was scrapped and that it sacrificed the separate autonomous economic system it had created, thus submitting both itself in particular, and the world in general, to dollar hegemony, which resulted in terrible consequences that continue to this day. Starikov on Why Stalin Was Right and How to Escape the Tyranny of the Western Financial System

http://russia-insider.com/en/history...istory/ri10734

I wouldn't say hes the top russian writer i think you know what advertisng and sensationalism does to draw visitors right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wd1_o9pyehE

[Gilrandir]

The import of your post is diffilult to trace. I will answer the parts that are intelligible.

Ok yes its good to know the person in contrary to you citation of the book Russia arch enemy entitles to me to envoke dont judge the book by its cover in the antrhopomorthic sense as well.

I don't judge a book, I shape my opinion of the writer looking through the list of books he wrote:

2006: Who killed Russian empire? The major mystery of XX century (2008 edition "1917. Not a revolution, but a special operation.")
2006: Myths and thruth about Civil war. Who finished off Russia?
2007: Betrayed Russia. Our "allies" from Boris Godunov to Nikolai II (2008 edition "Russia's archenemy: All evil comes from the West".)
2008: Who forced Hitler to attack Stalin.
2009: Crisis. How it is created.
2010: Who finances the destruction of Russia? From decembrists to mudjahids.
2010: It takes a war to save dollar.
2012: Stalin: let's remember him together.
2014: Ukraine. Chaos and revolution as the weapons of dollar.
2014: Russia. Crimea. History.

The author is an apologist of the idea that all the world is in conspiracy against Russia and is trying to destroy it by hook or by crook. And he remembers Stalin kindly.

So you like to attack the personality not the message,

I don't think much of the messages spread by the personality who wrote such books.

Ok and russian Regime haa like the undemocratic Coup in money pit Ukraine run by neo nazis and EU shills.

... which shows that you are totally free from pro-Russian propaganda and vision of the events in Ukraine.

I think he was harkening to the idea that Russia shouldn't repent for its past if that is so thats abhorrent to you.

I don't like the idea of repenting and apologizing for the past events. The past is full of horrors of all kinds and if we start doing that we must dig out all the grievances, even the minute ones, and try to make all the world around feel sorry. It will end in a deluge of claims for apology and still more grievances if someone refuses to apologize. Moreover, those who apologize (like modern Germany for nazism or the pope for the Crusades) have nothing to do with the past events.

So I don't think Russia should repent or apologize. But modern Russia goes even further: it refuses even to admit the evils done or tries to whitewash or justify them. This is unacceptable.

At first you claimed to know nothing of the individual.

Show me where I did.

I wouldn't say hes the top russian writer i think you know what advertisng and sensationalism does to draw visitors right?

But he is still a prominent political analyst, right?

[Lizardo]

BBC Radio Drama Gave Tips For Illegal Migrants In Somalia

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=I_5Ww5T29bs

[Snowhobbit]

Objected.

[Fragony]

Wäy tø gø Sweden http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...s-social-model

Whät the føk it cøsts møney we døn't häve, there ären't äny høuses

[Lizardo]

In Sweden now the male to female ratio is higher than the 30 years of the one child policy in China. 123 boys for every 100 girls

[Fragony]

In Sweden now the male to female ratio is higher than the 30 years of the one child policy in China. 123 boys for every 100 girls

Sweden has some bigger problems then the ratio of men and women, bigger problem is the attitude towards women of those they hauled in. Rape is rampant in Sweden, only South-Africa is worse.

[Snowhobbit]

In Sweden now the male to female ratio is higher than the 30 years of the one child policy in China. 123 boys for every 100 girls

Sweden does not solely consist of the teenager age-bracket.