Brexit Thread

[Philippus Flavius Homovallumus]

House prices may in some part be an indicator of wealth, but they are not an indicator of a residents disposable income, in fact if you look at the link the price fluctuation highlighted for the period is driven by people who may not even be residents of the area, as it notes its people seeking to avoid the upcoming tax on property they don't live in.
Remember the highlighted words, they are yours.
The key factor in assessing disposable income is income, without that you can't do anything with the statistics on house price, then you would need to factor in owner occupation, with and without outstanding mortgage, then the rental sector, then social rental sector then local charges, then transport costs and on and on and on.

The statistic provided means nothing in relation to local wealth or local disposable income, indeed with the article used it doesn't even mean local people.

House price indicates rental price, rental price indicates disposable income, as do the cost of mortgage re-payments, actually. Greyblades' argument was flawed in its simplicity, not its logic.

How is it offensive?

I was tempted to refuse to dignify this with a response but that would be pointless.

It was offensive because you dismissed the feelings of others as irrelevant, then described their opinion as drivel and nonsense, which are both insults.

Try real life face to face. For example I had an interesting discussion with an archtiect and two engineers today, words you describe as offensive were used plus some actually offensive ones, no one stormed out or wanted to throw things, an agreement was reached on the contended issues based on practicality and facts.

I try to be nice to people in real life - I get more hugs and free drinks that way.

[Pannonian]

House price indicates rental price, rental price indicates disposable income, as do the cost of mortgage re-payments, actually. Greyblades' argument was flawed in its simplicity, not its logic.

It's ironic that his simplicity breaks down where he tried to introduce complexity into the equation. Complexity of the sort Greyblades tried to introduce only makes sense when one understands the context of the data. In this case, he missed out the history of London and why certain areas are heavily non-white, and the nature of house prices in Greater London. In short, he tried to explain to a Londoner why certain things are in London, without himself understanding what he's talking about. Or my original point, which is that his assertion that Europhilism is the preserve of the white upper middle class who never have to face an immigrant, is contradicted by the fact that the most immigrant-heavy region in the UK was heavily pro-EU. And one of the reasons I have little respect for Greyblades is this argument of his.

Because the EU is how they got there, duh, same reason mexican immigrants vote democrat in the states. I refer to the Europhiles who buy into the ideology and supported inviting the immigrants in in the first place.

I don't have much beef with you, as you start with your own preconceptions, and your arguments, within these parameters, are broadly consistent. Contrast with Greyblades's circular argument, which starts from a wrong presumption (his assertion about the white upper middle class and Europhilism), then proceeds with easily disprovable further assertions to dismiss concrete evidence. This circle of wrongness is typical of post-truth politics, seen here in his argument for Brexit, but seen even more clearly in arguments for Corbyn (see Brenus dismissing all evidence against Corbyn as by nature biased). Concretely disprovable presumptions that serve to reinforce each other and shut out all evidence that may contradict them. Ironically, this mode of thinking was what led Blair towards Iraq in the first place. Even back then, I thought that form of argument was self-evidently stupid, so unsurprisingly I have a similarly low opinion of anyone who goes down the same line of thinking.

[Legs]

House price indicates rental price, ,





I try to be nice to people in real life - I get more hugs and free drinks that way.

No it doesn't. Rental price indicates rental price.
The two can be entirely unrelated

rental price indicates disposable income

No it doesn't, rental price is a factor in disposable income with additional information on net income and other expenses.

as do the cost of mortgage re-payments, actually.

Yes, and?
Are they presented at all?
Did anyone mention mortages in relation to housing and disposable income before the person you are quoting?

Greyblades' argument was flawed in its simplicity, not its logic.

That is not correct, it was flawed in both its simplicity and its logic. As has been demonstrated.

It was offensive because you dismissed the feelings of others as irrelevant, then described their opinion as drivel and nonsense, which are both insults.

Feelings can be irrelevant if they don't support the viewpoint. Drivel and nonsense are words used to describe notions that make no sense. If you take no sense you can see where the word nonsense fits exactly.
How are they insulting?

I try to be nice to people in real life - I get more hugs and free drinks that way.

And if you take the example I put up, there was no animosity, language which you would condider extremely insulting was used, a practical solution was agreed, I make more money, they make more money, which means we all get free drinks.
Thats real life.