So you're willing to consider how personal meta can explain away possible townish actions, but not to look into whether his d1 is something he does as town? All of your GH points come across like you had this pre-determined position on him, and then fit everything to match that position.
what does "complement ... in the center of attention" mean? How does that connect to his willingness to hint at, then claim a poisoning which could have easily been pinned on the dead 1x poisoner? What breadcrumbing lesson?
Why are you refusing?
So be a good sport and find something to make that case, instead of asking me to consider it as a hypothetical counter-argument?
In Visor's game, Pizza vigged - you, I think? - and breadcrumbed it to Renata as a town vig, explaining the reasoning to Barto in the QT. Here's what GH thought of it in this game.
Because I'm not interested in rereading the thread to ISO everyone for your pleasure, and then displeasure when I can't offer whatever you want of me. I've said all I can and want to for today.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
So be a good sport and find something to make that case, instead of asking me to consider it as a hypothetical counter-argument?
In Visor's game, Pizza vigged - you, I think? - and breadcrumbed it to Renata as a town vig, explaining the reasoning to Barto in the QT. Here's what GH thought of it in this game.
Because I'm not interested in rereading the thread to ISO everyone for your pleasure, and then displeasure when I can't offer whatever you want of me. I've said all I can and want to for today.
We're talking about barto, not Pizza.
So in your case on GH for failing to elaborate on khaan in a manner sufficiently pleasing to you, you are now failing to elaborate on GH in a manner sufficiently pleasing to me.
So in your case on GH for failing to elaborate on khaan in a manner sufficiently pleasing to you, you are now failing to elaborate on GH in a manner sufficiently pleasing to me.
Sounds like I can't help you. Take it up with management.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
So I've gone back and reread Monty. I'm not a fan of his inconsistencies, or his zeroing in on GHC when he is not here to defend himself. In addition to that I mislike the idea of lynching GHC when he has justifiable reasons for not engaging in substantial self defense. As I stated earlier, I'm down to rake him across the coals tomorrow, but doing so today seems to be less than ideal both because we increase our chance of lynching town, but also because we get less valid information to work with whether he pops town or scum.
Given the tie, and the fact that I know I am town: Vote: Montmorency.
So I've gone back and reread Monty. I'm not a fan of his inconsistencies, or his zeroing in on GHC when he is not here to defend himself. In addition to that I mislike the idea of lynching GHC when he has justifiable reasons for not engaging in substantial self defense. As I stated earlier, I'm down to rake him across the coals tomorrow, but doing so today seems to be less than ideal both because we increase our chance of lynching town, but also because we get less valid information to work with whether he pops town or scum.
Given the tie, and the fact that I know I am town: Vote: Montmorency.
So you're expecting the tunneling Monty to exit the tunnel for today only because of GHC's absence? Seems like an odd expectation, frankly.
And the tie is hardly a reason for voting Monty specifically?
So you're expecting the tunneling Monty to exit the tunnel for today only because of GHC's absence? Seems like an odd expectation, frankly.
And the tie is hardly a reason for voting Monty specifically?
I'm expecting for someone not to tunnel someone mostly unable to respond because it provides very little information. You're also ignoring the inconsistencies with his arguments, which are plentiful.
As to the other part, yes you're right it's a bad reason to vote for monty, but when you combine that with my dislike of his behavior, and the fact that it's a three way tie between myself, someone who isn't here, and someone that looks fishy as hell, yes it's a good reason to vote.
I'm expecting for someone not to tunnel someone mostly unable to respond because it provides very little information. You're also ignoring the inconsistencies with his arguments, which are plentiful.
SV has been entirely forgettable the last two days as well, after his D1 post bonanza.
as things should be, top poster is not my place
Convenient timing since I'm still not sure of much right now and willing to sheep you in bringing Autolycus to the table. Vote: Autolycus
Related, I'm wary of the first two wagons on the latest tally.
I think we've explored what can be explored and I'm not exactly satisfied. Finding someone (could be a scum buddy, even) to tunnel for reasons that noone quite agrees with sounds like the standard game plan for scum!Monty. I think I'll keep my vote on you and hope to extract as much info as possible from this lynch.
I've never said your suspicion of me is invalid. Tragically, it is misplaced.
Hopefully the scum will not have escaped reflection in this controversy. The info you should extract is that Barto and GH and all their accessories must go down.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
The info you should extract is that Barto and GH and all their accessories must go down.
Your cunicular affection is most distressing, I would say.
good lord| if you're telling the truth you're setting new records for scumminess as a townie -Renata on IM, 16/09/2011
Feles deliberatissimae subiugare humanitiati sunt, et res solae quae eas desinunt canes sunt.
I see I've been sigged yet again -Askthepizzaguy, 02/08/2012
Hindsight is 20/20 Askthepizzaguy, 10/07/2013
Convenient timing since I'm still not sure of much right now and willing to sheep you in bringing Autolycus to the table. Vote: Autolycus
Related, I'm wary of the first two wagons on the latest tally.
His reads have been static and contrived. He's gotten plenty of votes throughout the game but dodged the lynch. He's not a PR. What's there to be wary about?
His reads have been static and contrived. He's gotten plenty of votes throughout the game but dodged the lynch. He's not a PR. What's there to be wary about?
So you took away from that long argument and explanation of his thoughts that his reads have been static and contrived? Okay.
And how do you know he's not a PR? There seemingly are a lot of PRs here, going by claims.
His show today has made me think he's a bad lynch. Explaining his thought process and position well while showing he's not locked into GH being scum, such as acknowledging that the sudden rush of votes early on looked bad for the GH lynch and engaging in that extended argument with you.
His show today has made me think he's a bad lynch. Explaining his thought process and position well while showing he's not locked into GH being scum, such as acknowledging that the sudden rush of votes early on looked bad for the GH lynch and engaging in that extended argument with you.
I disagree strongly with that interpretation, lol.
Like Jabbz as the lynch still but will switch to monty if i need to.
Full participation tomorrow night or tuesday
"I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
"Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
"I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006
Originally Posted by TosaInu
At times I read back my own posts [...]. It's not always clear at first glance.
Re: Pokemon Nuzlocke FireRed Mafia [In Play]
Originally Posted by Zack
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks