Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

[Pontius Pilate]

Your statement is not one that is likely to convince anyone of anything.?

So this is better: I think the Roman faction should be deleted and replaced by the Boii. After all, they existed in this time period. I know it is just an analogy, but a poor one it is.

It's pretty hard to be specific when only one of the new factions is revealed, wouldn't you say?

Okay, forget the new factions for the moment, what about the old ones?


And The Celtic Viking, alot more people play EB than those on the forums, so I think there may be more than 5 people who reached the reforms. Also, you once again fail to mention the new units you want in the game, that is the whole point of your argument isn't it: The Augustans use up alot of unit slots which could be better used for other factions. Is it really that hard to just name a few units that you want in the game, and say what faction they belong to? Also once again, it is obivious that the Romans have the most of any faction but I don't think the EB team made it so by accident. There is alot more evidence left behind by Roman civilization than most factions, this may be why the Romans have the most. Look I am not trying to glorify Rome here, I would actually be okay if the August reforms were not in the game, but I think the timeline should be changed if that is the case. But if the end date remains 14AD I see no reason why the reforms should not be included. I think that we all can agree that the reforms were happening during post 27BC, and there should be no questioning this.

Again, this is not directed to anyone, just putting this argument out there.

okay.

but unlike Pontius, I am not that pro-Roman so I can recognize when there is something wrong when the Romans have a ton of units and people are worried how the new factions are gonna get any units.

I thought you said...oh never mind.