Sure, that's a valid point too. There's a window of time beyond which you can't reasonably expect to play older computer games, unless you keep an old PC around just for that purpose. But I think many of us would still like the same window of time we've had with previous games, for playing on older platforms that can still run these things. Invasive DRM shouldn't be the limiting factor there.
I have a bunch of games in my closet that I've re-installed over the years. Heck, I might want to revisit Rome one of these days, and re-install RTW for a little Phalanx-busting action. And I can still do that, as long as I don't jump too many generations of hardware and OS into the future. I don't think that's too much to ask for, when we're paying $60 for a game.
If the game companies want to rent us games as a limited-time service, pay-as-you-go for as long as the company lasts, at an appropriate price for a monthly rental, that would be one thing. And I think many of us might go for that. But this isn't what they're doing. They're charging a full commodity price for the game, as if we could use it forever (as long as we have the hardware to run it). But there's a time bomb attached to the game, that may nor not may go off at some future time when the company goes out of business.
Bookmarks