The Godfather, Part 3 [Concluded]

[Reenk Roink]

This line is the only one I will respond to (again):

I just think our final lynch choice, whatever it may be, should be based on logic and evidence

Firstly, "logic" in the broadest and technical (most important) sense is concerned with syntactical form.

Let's go ahead and assume that logic is a good way of moving forward (very debatable). My voting for others based on say retaliation is clearly a valid form:

If someone votes for me, then he is guilty
Someone voted for me
----------------------------------------
He/she is guilty

This reasoning form is modus ponens, it is the epitome of "logical" reasoning. Do you now see how weak a tool logic is? Logic does not concern itself with truth Atpg.

As to your "logical" cases against me, they have been proven on several cases to have inconsistencies both internal and external (you never responded to these charges). How can you justify your system as logical if you violate the most important primitive axiom of logic - the law of non contradiction?

Now to "evidence" all of it has been construed on cliches and presuppositions of what is and what isn't good townie behavior. I don't think I even need to bother refuting that which I can just dismiss.