Results 1 to 30 of 49

Thread: The right doesn't care about national defense.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Yes, indeedy, that's what the title says.

    The two parties(the conservatives and the right-wing progress paty) in this country who wants the strongest army and generally wants to increase the military budget are also the two parties, who, if in charge, would leave us with by far the weakest defense.

    Why is that? Well, it seems that the right-wingers think that war is only a matter of soldiers, guns and fancy war machines. They forget that a soldier needs food if he's going to survive, and so does the civilian population if there's going to be anyone left to defend. They want to increase military spending, check. But they also want to reduce farm subsidies, which will terminate our agricultural sector(except the fish). It'll work fine to import food from Brazil now, but when World War 3 knocks on our door, that might be a tad more difficult.

    The military the right wants can only do limited operations. It will literally starve in a prolonged war. And let's face it, if Norway gets invaded again, it'll be in World War 3. And that one isn't likely to be over in a hurry. So what will they do? We'll have to grow our own food again, of course. But the thing is, making food isn't as simple as putting some corn in the ground and waiting. To start using land that's been barren for some tens years will take time and resources, and you won't have much of either in World War 3.

    So, I guess it's classic right-wing politics yet again, we'll take the short term benefits now, and screw the future. I mean, we can always blame the jews again, can't we?
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  2. #2
    Nobody expects the Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin Death Trip
    Posts
    15,754

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Hmm, I tend to be pretty negative on farm subsidies, especially since I've lived around plenty of farmers and know the ******* they pull on the government. (Trust me, no welfare queen has ever bilked as much money out of the Feds as the average corn farmer.)

    But you raise an interesting point: Independent food supply as a security issue. Let's leave aside the rightwing/leftwing part of your post, and focus on this more tantalizing question.

    Is it worth it to subsidize unprofitable farmers in order to maintain a trade-independent food supply? Should every nation be able to feed its own people? Is that a realistic and worthwhile goal in an age of interconnectedness and globalization?

    Thoughts, please.
    Last edited by Lemur; 05-21-2009 at 18:16.

  3. #3
    The Usual Member Ice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Northville, Michigan
    Posts
    4,259

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemur View Post
    Hmm, I tend to be pretty negative on farm subsidies, especially since I've lived around plenty of farmers and know the ******* they pull on the government. (Trust me, no welfare queen has ever bilked as much money out of the Feds as the average corn farmer.)

    But you raise an interesting point: Independent food supply as a security issue. Let's leave aside the rightwing/leftwing part of your post, and focus on this more tantalizing question.

    Is it worth it to subsidize unprofitable farmers in order to maintain a trade-independent food supply? Should every nation be able to feed its own people? Is that a realistic and worthwhile goal in an age of interconnectedness and globalization?

    Thoughts, please.
    This is a great post, Lemur. Quite honestly, i highly doubt that World War III is any where close to happening, and the benefits gained from halting the farm subsidies far outweigh any national security issues.



  4. #4
    Spirit King Senior Member seireikhaan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Iowa, USA.
    Posts
    7,065
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemur View Post
    Hmm, I tend to be pretty negative on farm subsidies, especially since I've lived around plenty of farmers and know the ******* they pull on the government. (Trust me, no welfare queen has ever bilked as much money out of the Feds as the average corn farmer.)

    But you raise an interesting point: Independent food supply as a security issue. Let's leave aside the rightwing/leftwing part of your post, and focus on this more tantalizing question.

    Is it worth it to subsidize unprofitable farmers in order to maintain a trade-independent food supply? Should every nation be able to feed its own people? Is that a realistic and worthwhile goal in an age of interconnectedness and globalization?

    Thoughts, please.
    Lemur's got this nailed. At least in the US, these insane ag subsidies have to stop. Honestly, its not like we aren't competitive enough. Further, because of how the subsidies have been allocated, we're actually eroding our soil faster than we would have otherwise, because the gov't keeps throwing gobs of cash to grow MOAR corn, which dis-incentivizes farmers from letting a suitable portion of land lay fallow to allow for proper soil recuperation. Further, the fact that so many farmers are only growing corn means that even if they were letting some land lay fallow, they would have to let more of it lay fallow per year because crop rotation allows for better rejuvination than simply putting the same crop down year after year, which would actually offset a decent amount of ag output lost for being responsible farmers.


    Now, as to that second question- I don't know Norway's situation very well, other than that it isn't exactly the most terribly fertile nation ever. With that caveat, I would say ag subsidies are just not a good idea. Farming capability has never been higher, and Norway should trade some of their own goods that they have a comparative advantage- oil, fish, timber, and I believe mining- to obtain needed food. Besides, it is not as though the agricultural sector is likely to completely collapse- local farmers *should* still be able to offer competitive deals on foodstuffs due to lesser transport costs.
    It is better to conquer yourself than to win a thousand battles. Then, the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.

  5. #5
    This comment is witty! Senior Member LittleGrizzly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    The wilderness...
    Posts
    9,215

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    The point Lemur makes is the one thing that holds me back on agricultural subsidies.... well that and the fact the farms may be replaced by tower blocks...

    Though realistically thinking there isn't world war 3 just around the corner, there could be other things that happen that could interupt the food supply to Norway, prices could rise dramatically through a series of events (earth warming, seas rising, growing fuels, lots of 2nd (and 3rd) world countrys increasing thier meat intake, population increases)

    So maybe keeping a small subsidised agricultural sector isn't too bad an idea... in Nowray at least, from the sounds of it USA is worse off with subsidised agriculture...
    In remembrance of our great Admin Tosa Inu, A tireless worker with the patience of a saint. As long as I live I will not forget you. Thank you for everything!

  6. #6
    BrownWings: AirViceMarshall Senior Member Furunculus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Forever adrift
    Posts
    5,958

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by LittleGrizzly View Post
    The point Lemur makes is the one thing that holds me back on agricultural subsidies.... well that and the fact the farms may be replaced by tower blocks...

    Though realistically thinking there isn't world war 3 just around the corner, there could be other things that happen that could interupt the food supply to Norway, prices could rise dramatically through a series of events (earth warming, seas rising, growing fuels, lots of 2nd (and 3rd) world countrys increasing thier meat intake, population increases)

    So maybe keeping a small subsidised agricultural sector isn't too bad an idea... in Nowray at least, from the sounds of it USA is worse off with subsidised agriculture...
    small and subsidised are an oxymoron.

    @ HT

    yes, food-supply is a strategic issue to be considered in the context of security.

    however, if norway occupies a similar situation to britain then the nation is incapable of feeding itself and thus dependent on imports, better to ensure the military muscle to preclude or deter other nations from trying to interdict food supplies.

    but i'm presuming norway isn't in that situation, however i still oppose subsidised food production because for the 99% of time your nation is not at war there are much higher ROI's on industries other than food on which improve a nations wealth, and a little of that surplus can be fed back into defence to ensure that neighbouring nations don't choose to play silly buggers.

    lets face it, if russia decides it needs a little more strategic depth what will prove the greater deterrent; greater agricultural self sufficiency or a better equipped military and nato membership?
    Last edited by Furunculus; 05-21-2009 at 23:23.
    Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar

  7. #7
    Clan Takiyama Senior Member CBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,408

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Woah WW3? Well you should not worry too much as all the nukes will kill off most people anyway. The Norwegians who survive will be a better and stronger breed for sure! and with a less fatalistic world view...


    CBR


  8. #8
    Darkside Medic Senior Member rory_20_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Taplow, UK
    Posts
    8,690
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Throwing money at farmers isn't going to help massively in extremis in any case. If uneconomic, inefficient practices get money now, why bother innovating - regardless if the leaders are right or left wing.

    I think that Norway would be far better off spending money on research in areas such as harnessing heat and CO2 from industry / hardy plants / alternate ways of growing crops. The food isn't needed now, and the possible benefits would be applicable at home and an asset which can be sold abroad.

    The USA is of course in a very different situation, but here again throwing money at rednecks is only ever a short term vote winner.

    An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
    Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
    "If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
    If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill

  9. #9
    Kanto Kanrei Member Marshal Murat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Eye of the Hurricane (FL)
    Posts
    3,372

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    To start using land that's been barren for some tens years will take time and resources, and you won't have much of either in World War 3.
    What exactly do you mean when you say "barren"? Are we talking about land unsuitable for farming or land not recently used for farming?
    I don't think Norway (coming from someone whose only experience of Norway is from Maelstrom in Epcot) would have many problems with any conflicts, near or far. If a WW3 conflict were to break out, it wouldn't be impossible to begin planting food again while using a short-term import plan from outside the nation.

    In response to subsidized agriculture: BAD IDEA
    The original subsidies for farmers to grow corn were to help them (duh), but now latifundia-esque farms are using subsidies to grow enormous amounts of crops for profit to fatten Americans. It's disgusting and should be stopped, if only to preserve the rich texture of Middle America (and all those right-wing Farmer votes, which brings us back to the original topic)
    "Nietzsche is dead" - God

    "I agree, although I support China I support anyone discovering things for Science and humanity." - lenin96

    Re: Pursuit of happiness
    Have you just been dumped?

    I ask because it's usually something like that which causes outbursts like this, needless to say I dissagree completely.

  10. #10
    Master of useless knowledge Senior Member Kitten Shooting Champion, Eskiv Champion Ironside's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,902

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by CBR View Post
    Woah WW3? Well you should not worry too much as all the nukes will kill off most people anyway. The Norwegians who survive will be a better and stronger breed for sure! and with a less fatalistic world view...


    CBR

    The loss of infrastructure and lack of food is the big killer in the early post-apocalyptic world and quite possibly on the same scale as the nukes themselves.
    We are all aware that the senses can be deceived, the eyes fooled. But how can we be sure our senses are not being deceived at any particular time, or even all the time? Might I just be a brain in a tank somewhere, tricked all my life into believing in the events of this world by some insane computer? And does my life gain or lose meaning based on my reaction to such solipsism?

    Project PYRRHO, Specimen 46, Vat 7
    Activity Recorded M.Y. 2302.22467
    TERMINATION OF SPECIMEN ADVISED

  11. #11
    Darkside Medic Senior Member rory_20_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Taplow, UK
    Posts
    8,690
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ironside View Post
    The loss of infrastructure and lack of food is the big killer in the early post-apocalyptic world and quite possibly on the same scale as the nukes themselves.
    Without doubt.

    Some parts of the world will go on as before. The parts of Africa that are doing OK for example. Almost everywhere else will at the very least see a c. 70% in population - the old will all die and the young will kill each other for resources.

    What to do? Unless you want an agrarian economy that utilises everything from nearby the country is going to take a hit.

    An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
    Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
    "If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
    If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill

  12. #12
    Clan Takiyama Senior Member CBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,408

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ironside View Post
    The loss of infrastructure and lack of food is the big killer in the early post-apocalyptic world and quite possibly on the same scale as the nukes themselves.
    Actually that is what I meant but I was just not clear enough.

    If anyone has not watched the mid 80's BBC drama "Threads" about the post-nuclear effects in Britain then I recommend it. It is rather depressing though.


    CBR

  13. #13
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default Re : The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    they also want to reduce farm subsidies, which will terminate our agricultural sector
    Norway shouldn't produce food. It is bad for the environment. Save for a few square kilometers in the south, producing food in Norway (in any commercially viable way) is only possible artificially.
    Locally produced food, counter-intuitively, is worse for the environment than producing food in more fertile lands and shipping it halway around the world.

    Instead, Norway should focus on hightech biotechnology, to increase the output of tall blond girls with huge
    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  14. #14
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Re : The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat View Post
    Norway shouldn't produce food. It is bad for the environment. Save for a few square kilometers in the south, producing food in Norway (in any commercially viable way) is only possible artificially.
    Locally produced food, counter-intuitively, is worse for the environment than producing food in more fertile lands and shipping it halway around the world.
    Environment? I was talking national defense here, stay on topic

    But yes, it's true. Except for a few tiny dots* spread around, Norway just doesn't have the soil to produce large quantities of food, or food capable of competing with anyone but Iceland. The subsidies here don't "hamper innovation", there won't be any more innovation without subsidies, simply because there's just no way to grow food here at a competitive price. It's impossible. So, the choice we have isn't to "support it or not", it's a simple choice of should we grow food at all here, or not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat View Post
    Instead, Norway should focus on hightech biotechnology, to increase the output of tall blond girls with huge
    Can't argue with that, obviously. But I propose an exchange, Louis. You can get my tall, blond girls, while I get your delicious french-speaking ones. Deal?

    *and I do mean tiny. The farm I lived on last year was such a spot, but the good soil was just a kilometre or two.

    @Marshall Murat: I was talking about land that hasn't been used for, say a decade or so. Or even better, old farmland now turned into something else.

    As for how likely it is for us to get attacked; well, we're Russia's neighbor.... If europe gets attacked from the east again, we're likely to be the first meal.

    But then again, that's my original point, isn't it? "Well, we can cut subsidies just fine, no worries, we won't get attacked"... But if we won't get attacked, then what the hell do we need that bloody army for....?*

    *remember, this thread was originally a whine about right-wingers general incompetence, not about subsidies
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  15. #15
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Norway's national defence plan came up in another thread, didn't it? I'm fairly sure that the detail that Norway only had to hold for a few weeks for the defence plan to be a "success" against the Russians came up somewhere.

    Nobody is going to starve to death in that time. I'd be more worried about Russians than grain in a WWIII.
    Last edited by Evil_Maniac From Mars; 05-21-2009 at 21:25.

  16. #16
    Sovereign Oppressor Member TIE Fighter Shooter Champion, Turkey Shoot Champion, Juggler Champion Kralizec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,812

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars View Post
    Norway's national defence plan came up in another thread, didn't it? I'm fairly sure that the detail that Norway only had to hold for a few weeks for the defence plan to be a "success" against the Russians came up somewhere.

    Nobody is going to starve to death in that time. I'd be more worried about Russians than grain in a WWIII.
    Agreed...

    And agricultural welfare = bad.

  17. #17
    Know the dark side Member Askthepizzaguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    25,830

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Yes, indeedy, that's what the title says.

    The two parties(the conservatives and the right-wing progress paty) in this country who wants the strongest army and generally wants to increase the military budget are also the two parties, who, if in charge, would leave us with by far the weakest defense.
    I admit, when it comes to Norway I am totally out of my element.

    1. What military power are you threatened by? Russia couldn't attack the European Union without half the world coming to your rescue and the other staying neutral.

    2. Why couldn't you get your food from the United States? Basically the only thing we export these days is food

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    and "Democracy"


    3. If food is in such demand in your country, why do the farmers need subsidies from the government? They should be rich.



    But then again I haven't the foggiest idea what I am talking about half the time, so feel free to bring me up to speed.
    Last edited by Askthepizzaguy; 05-23-2009 at 19:36.
    #Winstontoostrong
    #Montytoostronger

  18. #18
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by Alexander the Pretty Good View Post
    Those countries one step up the ladder likely subsidize their agriculture...
    That would be the countries one further step up the ladder.

    Quote Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy View Post
    I admit, when it comes to Norway I am totally out of my element.

    1. What military power are you threatened by? Russia couldn't attack the European Union without half the world coming to your rescue and the other staying neutral.
    The only scenario, in the current world, in which we could get attacked, is in a world war 3 scenario. Basically it would have to be an attack on europe(EU), in which case we would be dragged along(due to tasty oil, and a coastline to attack england).

    Quote Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy View Post
    2. Why couldn't you get your food from the United States? Basically the only thing we export these days is food
    Because we're talking WW3 here. The world would be at war, including the United States, and well, relying on shipping in such a situation isn't ideal...

    Quote Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy View Post
    3. If food is in such demand in your country, why do the farmers need subsidies from the government? They should be rich.
    Because it's very hard to grow something here, and thus very expensive. To explain a little further; let's say you have one acre of land, and you wish to grow wheat there. With the soil in Norway, you can get x amount of wheat from it. With one acre in a more fertile country, like say Brazil, you would get 10x wheat.

    Also, 1000 USD is a fortune in some countries, while it's pocket change here....
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  19. #19
    Know the dark side Member Askthepizzaguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    25,830

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    The only scenario, in the current world, in which we could get attacked, is in a world war 3 scenario. Basically it would have to be an attack on europe(EU), in which case we would be dragged along(due to tasty oil, and a coastline to attack england).
    The trouble I see here is this; you would have to spend a huge chunk of your economy on creating a vast military to even slow down a huge threat like Russia. It's unrealistic to expect to be able to do so... it would be like Denmark becoming the 5th greatest military on the planet. Even if you could do so, you'd collapse in on yourself like the Soviet Union.

    Because we're talking WW3 here. The world would be at war, including the United States, and well, relying on shipping in such a situation isn't ideal...
    I see your point. I really think we've gone beyond self-sufficiency here, though; few nations can support themselves individually. Some are too small or too poor to have a huge army, or cannot afford the space or the effort to grow their own food. What you should have is a stockpile of non-perishable food and containers of fresh water stored by the government in facilities all over the nation, which over time will accumulate and provide food and clean water in times of crisis like war or famine.

    Or at least I think it's a good idea. We have gone too far; we cannot revert back to an agrarian economy. There are too many people and not enough arable lands for everyone. A tree cannot revert back into a sapling. The only realistic option to prepare for times of need is to store surplus goods. Take the money you would be spending on farm subsidies and use it to buy non-perishable goods and you'll actually be making an investment in your future rather than spending money on expensive crops that will die and farmland which can be easily destroyed or devastated by conflict or weather patterns. Buy a lot of cheap crops and can them and store them.

    Or perhaps a little bit of both. I suppose increasing your own food yield isn't exactly a bad notion; I just think it's expensive and inefficient to put all your effort in that one direction when it may not be practical for Norway.

    I'd like to think the United States and other allies will be there to kick some invader butt... that is, if our economy doesn't collapse or we don't lose all credibility with the international community. But I guess you can't count on that.

    Because it's very hard to grow something here, and thus very expensive. To explain a little further; let's say you have one acre of land, and you wish to grow wheat there. With the soil in Norway, you can get x amount of wheat from it. With one acre in a more fertile country, like say Brazil, you would get 10x wheat.

    Also, 1000 USD is a fortune in some countries, while it's pocket change here....
    I think I understand more clearly now. Thanks!
    #Winstontoostrong
    #Montytoostronger

  20. #20
    Corporate Hippie Member rasoforos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    2,713

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy View Post
    The trouble I see here is this; you would have to spend a huge chunk of your economy on creating a vast military to even slow down a huge threat like Russia.
    You can buy a lot of Vodka and leave it at the borders



    Forget resource independence. It is a dinosaur. The modern global economy is too interconnected for said independence to be a viable strategy. You may do it in theory but not without an immensely huge penalty on your GDP.
    Αξιζει φιλε να πεθανεις για ενα ονειρο, κι ας ειναι η φωτια του να σε καψει.

    http://grumpygreekguy.tumblr.com/

  21. #21
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy View Post
    The trouble I see here is this; you would have to spend a huge chunk of your economy on creating a vast military to even slow down a huge threat like Russia. It's unrealistic to expect to be able to do so... it would be like Denmark becoming the 5th greatest military on the planet. Even if you could do so, you'd collapse in on yourself like the Soviet Union.
    Hey, I'm pretty damn honest about not caring about national defense in the slightest, I've said a million times that I want the army disbanded(30 billion we could spend on something useful...).

    However, the right-wingers want national defense. They want a huge army to defend our country. However, when they instead disband our agriculture, their national defense plan is useless, which is what my original post was about
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  22. #22
    Darkside Medic Senior Member rory_20_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Taplow, UK
    Posts
    8,690
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: The right doesn't care about national defense.

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Hey, I'm pretty damn honest about not caring about national defense in the slightest, I've said a million times that I want the army disbanded(30 billion we could spend on something useful...).

    However, the right-wingers want national defense. They want a huge army to defend our country. However, when they instead disband our agriculture, their national defense plan is useless, which is what my original post was about
    Who is going to attack these dictators then?

    An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
    Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
    "If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
    If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO