Results 1 to 30 of 818

Thread: Mafia Mongolica [Concluded]

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Bureaucratically Efficient Senior Member TinCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    13,729

    Default Re: Mafia Mongolica (IN PLAY)

    Quote Originally Posted by Reenk Roink View Post
    Let's see it?

    To be honest I'm not sure what to make of you TinCow. Can you explain why we should focus on a broader target group at this point? After all, at this point, there is very little to go on, spreading the vote thin will make it easier for the bad guys as their vote can count more and they can also hide behind various targets. This is not to say that we should focus on Atpg/Beskar exclusively, no no no. I certainly welcome a broadening of the targets, though not for its own sake. If anyone has a theory, please speak up.
    Are you kidding me? Let me re-quote you to see if I've got this right...

    Can you explain why we should focus on a broader target group at this point?... spreading the vote thin will make it easier for the bad guys as their vote can count more and they can also hide behind various targets.
    Followed by...

    I certainly welcome a broadening of the targets, though not for its own sake.
    Nicely done. Way to cover both sides of the argument with the thinnest possible plausible explanation to keep it from being totally absurd. You seem to be claiming there's a great deal of evidence against Beskar, and I call foul on that. What did he do, vote in a manner that saved ATPG? I did the same thing, yet you ignored me. Your evidence against Beskar is wafer thin, yet you keep pumping it every round. GH's death does point the finger at him, but that's the ultimate WIFOM and you know it. You're being incredibly focused on Beskar, and that doesn't seem like you at all from my limited experience. I've never seen you go after someone with this level of tenacity, and you are doing so in a situation with evidence that is equivocal at best.

    At this point, it is YOU that is acting abnormally.

    So if you had made a case against me, I would like to see it. Put your money where your mouth is and give us more targets.
    A bit defensive are we? I originally erased my argument against you because I didn't think it was very strong. Your response is making me reconsider that position.
    Last edited by TinCow; 07-23-2009 at 02:43.


Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO