Are you kidding me? Let me re-quote you to see if I've got this right...
Followed by...Can you explain why we should focus on a broader target group at this point?... spreading the vote thin will make it easier for the bad guys as their vote can count more and they can also hide behind various targets.
Nicely done. Way to cover both sides of the argument with the thinnest possible plausible explanation to keep it from being totally absurd. You seem to be claiming there's a great deal of evidence against Beskar, and I call foul on that. What did he do, vote in a manner that saved ATPG? I did the same thing, yet you ignored me. Your evidence against Beskar is wafer thin, yet you keep pumping it every round. GH's death does point the finger at him, but that's the ultimate WIFOM and you know it. You're being incredibly focused on Beskar, and that doesn't seem like you at all from my limited experience. I've never seen you go after someone with this level of tenacity, and you are doing so in a situation with evidence that is equivocal at best.I certainly welcome a broadening of the targets, though not for its own sake.
At this point, it is YOU that is acting abnormally.
A bit defensive are we? I originally erased my argument against you because I didn't think it was very strong. Your response is making me reconsider that position.So if you had made a case against me, I would like to see it. Put your money where your mouth is and give us more targets.
Bookmarks