Quote Originally Posted by Zim View Post
I've always found the groups most for inerrancy to be the ones most hostile to that idea. Most of the people I encountered that seriously entertained it have been the ones that believe that the writers of the bible were fallible, and/or that the canon's establishment was faulty. Given the way Judas is depicted in the four gospels, I'd think it would be hard to come to the conclusion that Jusdas was really a good guy while still thinking the main four gospels were inerrant.
The key part was "just because"

The arguement runs that Jesus must have known Judas was going to betray him, and that since it was planned Judas could really be blamed.

These are people who believe a consistantly bad anthology to be final word of God until the Rapture, I wouldn't look for consistancy.