According to the author, the balanced view leads to a happier, longer, and more fulfilling life. No where does it confirm your Orwellian fears. (OK, I didn't read the last 1/3rd)
So, you're saying balanced individuals are bad then?
Someone needs to work on his cognitive biases.
You're exactly right, kinda. It isn't about the religion. It's about the people.
Last edited by Vladimir; 08-03-2009 at 20:31.
Reinvent the British and you get a global finance center, edible food and better service. Reinvent the French and you may just get more Germans.
Ik hou van ferme grieten en dikke pintenOriginally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars
Down with dried flowers!
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
I'm saying purity is not as important as fairness and caring--homosexuality may be disgusting, but not allowing gay marriage is unfair and uncaring. If you read the quote here:
He explains that the binding moral virtues are cultivated to ensure that the other foundations are enforced.Cultural conservatives work hard to cultivate moral virtues based on the three binding foundations: ingroup/loyalty, authority/respect, and purity/sanctity, as well as on the universally employed foundations of harm/care and fairness/reciprocity. The beehive ideal is not a world of maximum freedom, it is a world of order and tradition in which people are united by a shared moral code that is effectively enforced, which enables people to trust each other to play their interdependent roles. It is a world of very high social capital and low anomie.
You are saying that the five spheres are equally important and should be balanced out--but even in religion 3 of the spheres are important only to ensure protection of the other two. In a contractual society we use other means, and thereby grant people more freedoms, at a slight cost to average happiness and longevity.
Balanced is not inherently good.
As for flag burning, it was an issue a while back.
Bookmarks