Quote Originally Posted by Centurion1 View Post
In some ways i wish protection laws to be stricter especially in cases like rape and molesting. However, they need to judge cases more individually so that these poor kids don't get the rest of thewir lives ruined for having sex with girls their own age. (whether they should be having sex is a whole nother thing, but as long as it is consensual and is not rape or similar ilk they should not be receiving sex offender status)
The simple, effective definition:

Stop calling it child pornography. It's not pornography, that's something entirely different. We're talking about child abuse photo's. Start calling it that instead of child porn, and all of a sudden, what pictures are legal and which ones are not becomes crystal clear. The ones we want to punish people for comes from child abuse. If it doesn't come from child abuse, then it's simply a harmless photo of a toddler, like in this case.

Oh, and for the record, I would've been a sex offender if I lived in the US. I'm rather happy I live here in hippieland instead...