I knew you were innocent though, which is why I didn't advocate your bandwagon (don't think Chaotix was scum either), and thus why I showed you the PM that is identical to your own. I wouldn't have done that if you weren't dead, nor would I have done so if I wasn't so bloody frustrated right now.

I still want to know what it is that appeared scummy in my Methos-related post, though; if something I'm doing is looking scummy when I'm town, then I'm playing bad or your interpretations are askew.

To me, my post is explanitory and offers food for thought to town regarding Methos and Renata (the latter particularly, who seems to have gone from a near-death experience in the first day phase to a single vote in the second), and I've asked two very good players about my post and they've agreed it doesn't seem scummy, but to others it seems to be. I'd like to know why it's considered scummy to explain one's thoughts but not to simply type a vote and a short, unrelated sentence such as "vote: X. X needs to die".