People do this all the time though. Your vote was picked up on because of who you are; I've seen similar votes slip by all the time without anyone batting an eyelid.
Am I in that club? I spoke to you about Methos at your home yesterday, and you expressed frustration that nobody else seemed to care about his unvoting; I genuinely found it suspicious and agreed with you, so I posted what I did. He answered and abated some of my concerns, but new ones arose as a result.In short, people talk out of their behind and they are the ones who should be lynched.
Yes, and I was town there too. I'm fine with being accused like so when I'm mafia, because at least people are right in their suspicions, but when I'm town it frustrates me beyond comprehension because it seems to say "you're doing it wrong". It seems like you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't most of the time.
It's me laying down my thoughts on the situation, because nobody else seems to do so beyond one or two noncommittal sentences. It's like two English gentleman sat down simply exchanging monosyllabic pleasantries with one another; "mmmm", "yes", "quite", "rather", and it was irking the hell out of me.People are jumping on your case on methos because they think it's scummy that you'd make a big persuasive post this early.
The thread needed some more debate injected into it beyond stupid random bandwagonning and I took that to task. As I said, Methos' unvoting had been unchallenged by all except Beskar, and Renata's five votes decreased to a single vote despite the fact she was still setting off people's scumdars.
If I'm scummy for doing that, then I play town wrong and I should stop now.
Bookmarks