Hundreds? The Wiki page says he only had 4.
I am inorz!
Not this time/ GAH!!
Hundreds? The Wiki page says he only had 4.
It was a valid point to make, though, if somewhat embellished.
Palpatine actually had considerably more than four clones initially, from what I've been told by someone who read the relevant fiction, it's simply that most of them were unfit for use over time.
No matter how many there were, though, it is something to consider; I simply feel that this victory was too easy, and there may be a twist in the plot yet.
"Blacker than a moonless night. Hotter and more bitter than Hell itself… that is coffee."
Yes, there's a possibility of someone such as Exar Kun being in the game, considering we've seen at least Atris from the KOTOR series.
"Blacker than a moonless night. Hotter and more bitter than Hell itself… that is coffee."
A long, long time ago in a galaxy far, far away...
"Blacker than a moonless night. Hotter and more bitter than Hell itself… that is coffee."
Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer: The Gameroom
It looks like it was a good lynch, given the fact that Khaan did not protest. But Palpatine could just be a name. As people have suggested, his lynch was too easy and even in the write-up he accepted his fate quietly. I wouldnt be surprised if Sigurd used these name to stop mass reveals.
We may or may not know more tonight. I for one do not believe the sith rule of 2 is being used in this game....may be they are restricted to 2 kills a night.
Given the number of pro-town abilities i am not sure what to expect from the Sith.
While I certainly agree that what you say makes sense in principle, I really read the update as saying that Palpatine was just an Initiate. I will gladly admit that I'm used to the CFC way, where lynches always reveal, so I may just be expecting too much here. But it sure feels rather anti-climactic if we managed to nail the big baddie, and all we got was the shortest update so far. (No offense to Sigurd of course, still an awesome update, as always!)
It usually isn't revealed in a big way.
Lol @ sasaki
It totally is. Poor Niklas. And I'm so very nearly convinced it'll be undeserved. But them's the breaks. Better work on your debating skills, Niklas; seems you'll need them.
I'm truly looking forward to tomorrow's morning update. If it's substantially different, it should be enlightening. If not (which seems unlikely), then that's something too.
Oh boy just read Khaan's post. Hee.
@ Secura -- who knows? But possibilities like that are why I'm so much looking forward to the morning update. Pretty much whatever happens will be really interesting.
#Winstontoostrong
#Montytoostronger
#Hillary4prism
BD:TW
Some piously affirm: "The truth is such and such. I know! I see!"
And hold that everything depends upon having the “right” religion.
But when one really knows, one has no need of religion. - Mahavyuha Sutra
Freedom necessarily involves risk. - Alan Watts
Soft claiming is like soft ice, sweet and uhm, soft and yeah!!!
![]()
![]()
"Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu
All the claims that you make about my "suspiciousness" interestingly all apply to you. You accuse me of acting the same as I did in Mafia IX. Since I happen to know exactly how I acted in Mafia IX, let's take a look at my strategy.
Now, let's take a look at your posting record, for giggles.
- I tried to coast by, keeping just above the "Soon-to-be-WOG'd" line.
- Excusing my lack of posts with IRL events/metagaming.
- Dismissing claims against me with inane comments, or disdain.
- Not joining in the bandwagon on Chaotix, instead preferring some random other player, so it wouldn't look like I was trying too hard to stop a lynch on Chaotix.
- One word posts to make it look like I was involved in the game and thinking really really hard about how to help the townies win.
- Not providing any justification for my votes, referring to either analysis that other people have made, or instead mysteriously providing no evidence for my line of thinking, thus ensuring that my comments, and therefore that I, would not come under any scrutiny.
I don't know what the rest of the town thinks, but it looks to me like you are accusing me of behaving in a manner similar to my behaviours in Mafia IX in the hopes of defusing any criticism that might develop about your own posting style later in the game. I have resisted the temptation thus far to lodge a vote against your scummy behaviour for fear of your shrill cries of "OMGUS", but I now know exactly where my next vote is going tomorrow.
- Very small number of posts, given your reputation for being an active player.
- Excusing that small number of posts with external events/metagaming
- Dismissing concerns raised about you with disdain (See: The first analysis will do for me.)
- Not joining in the bandwagon against 'Khaan, or the next most likely lynch (AVSM).
- One word posts which make it look like you are involved in the game and thinking really really really hard about how to help us win (E.g. "Terrible")
- Not providing any justification for your votes (See your vote for me whilst criticising Chaotix), referring to either analysis that other people have made, or instead mysteriously providing no evidence for your line of thinking, thus ensuring that your comments, and therefore that you would not come under any scrutiny.
Last edited by Subotan; 04-22-2010 at 13:23. Reason: Syntax
Subotan raises valid points about Thermal Mercury![]()
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
Interesting why Yaseikhaan was so obsessed with lynching me. He was Palatine.
Told you the Sith were hiding in the votes against me.
Last edited by Beskar; 04-22-2010 at 13:28.
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
Bookmarks