Duh, guys, it's the same old arguments and they're still as bad as they were back then.
Israel may cause collateral damage, that would be fine if they didn't do it to defend illegal settlements that they built on the razed former homes of Palestinians.
The israeli settlers who "train" their children to throw stones at palestinian children while the army watches hardly prove that Israel is only in it because it was attacked, that's all a load of rubbish.
The Palestinians on the other hand fire homemade rockets into israeli cities, that's a terrorist attack, it's nowhere near a targeted attack on military, they also send their children to blow themselves up in israeli buses, trams and cafes, hardly places where you expect military, they're using prolonged terrorist scare tactics which obviously don't soften up the Israelis but make them harder and harder, they also "train" their kids to throw stones at israelis.
To say that either side just wants to live in peace is also rubbish, there are enough people on both sides who don't want peace that there is none and while I believe that both sides may have people who do want peace, they are obviously not getting through on too many levels, either because they're too quiet or because they're drowned out by those who prefer war.
This whole "Israel is better!" - "No, Palestine is better!" etc. seems pretty pathetic considering that they're both a thousand times worse than for example Norway. It's like choosing sides between Sauron and Palpatine.
Or...wait for it...