In addition to posting tallies, you also see the current tally as a tooltip in the header of every single post, so that you can see what the tally was when that post was made.
The plugin can also be used to do ISOs or to isolate a set of posters.
ISOing is smoothest when displaying many posts per page, the maximum on this forum is 80, you adjust that here: https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/profi...do=editoptions
09-29-2016, 14:18
novice
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
My lynch preferences:
GeneralHankerchief
johnhughthom
Al Sipsclar
Montmorency
Not really willing to lynch, but continuing the list:
Cuthillius
Pelican
Dp101
Riedquat
Askthepizzaguy
Murska
Winston Hughes
atheotes
Choxorn
novice
09-29-2016, 14:31
novice
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
I ISO'ed Al Sipsclar, didn't take long. His only post of substance is this one:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Sipsclar
I've read up to this post and just want to mention that I'm also fighting the urge to vote Monty, being kinda out-of-towner myself, so I guess I'm part of that hive mind myself. I only played one game with Monty (he's town, me - scum) so it was not enough to learn his style.
I was ready to vote El Barto today, so I do think he's a lynchbait and would be an unorthodox kill choice for mafia.
This is not the first time Visor is lynching town Spaceman on D1 for posting like Spaceman.
Dp101 reminds me of Cass with his (her? preferred pronouns?) thorough approach to the game. Not alignment indicative, though.
I'll sheep Visor for now and Vote: choxorn
He has a towny tone but has only voted for confirmed townies, Choxorn, and Stork.
The line "I was ready to vote El Barto today, so I do think he's a lynchbait and would be an unorthodox kill choice for mafia." is a bit cheeky if mafia. He didn't go anywhere N2 (?) according to Pizza. But he stays on my "willing to lynch" list.
09-29-2016, 14:53
Riedquat
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by atheotes
Winston - softclaimed something - ???
Okey, would be easier to count the known and the presumably vanillas... :inquisitive:
09-29-2016, 14:58
novice
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winston Hughes
Guess we're going to have to wait and see what GH and chox have to say for themselves.
I do have an angle here, btw, though to my knowledge I had nothing to do with the situation in question.
I guess this is the softclaim atheotes is referring to.
09-29-2016, 15:04
Dp101
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Novice, you going to claim? Or did I miss you doing that.
09-29-2016, 15:10
novice
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riedquat
I don't know if it will activate again when I scan another robot or person of interest to me, but for the time being yes kleptomania is always usable and I guess if my target can kill the result will be like CrimsonFox, a threat to my survival.
Sounds to me like Riedquat's scan can indeed nail GH. And Riedquat has a personal interest in scanning robots, IIUC. So I may be willing to postpone a GH lynch. OTOH scum can just block Riedquat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montmorency
Day 3 activities. What do you think?
What are you saying here?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montmorency
I'm more interested in seeing you work in tandem with GH.
So you think Pizza and GH are scum together after all?
I wanted to say something more but it's slipped my mind.
09-29-2016, 15:10
novice
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dp101
Novice, you going to claim? Or did I miss you doing that.
Do you want me to?
09-29-2016, 15:16
Dp101
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by novice
Do you want me to?
I mean, everyone else is, and a complete list would be nice. Also, forgot to mention this, but thanks for adapting the plugin, it makes it so much easier to play the game.
09-29-2016, 15:19
novice
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
JohnHughThom, I sympathize with your mission statement on enjoying the game and not polluting the thread, but I think at this point you should be able to provide some commentary. Or do you disagree, has everything needing to be said been said?
09-29-2016, 15:25
novice
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
This seems like a useful feature on this forum, if I can get it to work: @johnhughthom, question for you in the previous post.
09-29-2016, 15:33
Riedquat
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by novice
Sounds to me like Riedquat's scan can indeed nail GH. And Riedquat has a personal interest in scanning robots, IIUC. So I may be willing to postpone a GH lynch. OTOH scum can just block Riedquat.
Or scum can just kill me and tomorrow town will be again stuck in today's situation. I would like a full disclosure from GH's night actions first, I just can't see the harm on it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by novice
JohnHughThom, I sympathize with your mission statement on enjoying the game and not polluting the thread, but I think at this point you should be able to provide some commentary. Or do you disagree, has everything needing to be said been said?
For what is worth he is no threat.... to me!
09-29-2016, 15:45
Riedquat
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by novice
I guess this is the softclaim atheotes is referring to.
Not sure... need to check all his posts, but perhaps was something else.
09-29-2016, 16:09
novice
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riedquat
For what is worth he is no threat.... to me!
So you scanned him? When? Remind me what your night actions have been.
Your average for the first 7 days is about 22 posts per day. Then you were really active on the 25th, and your activity has been dropping like a rock ever since.
Activity tends to go up as we have more information and claims and vote history. Why is yours going downward?
My activity always varies depending on how many people are in the thread and how much there is to discuss. I revert to MU-type posting when the thread is alive and people are posting, and more to GitP-type meta when it's not. It hasn't really been very invigoratingly active of late.
09-29-2016, 16:38
Cuthillius
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuthillius
My activity always varies depending on how many people are in the thread and how much there is to discuss. I revert to MU-type posting when the thread is alive and people are posting, and more to GitP-type meta when it's not. It hasn't really been very invigoratingly active of late.
This is true of literally every game I play in that has more than GitP-level activity. That one we played in recently where I had 358 posts on d1? 278 on d2, 51 on d3, 49 on d4, 52 on d5, and 75 on the last day.
09-29-2016, 16:43
Cuthillius
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
novice, do you really think hankerchief's mason claim is a lie? why?
09-29-2016, 16:50
Murska
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuthillius
novice, do you really think hankerchief's mason claim is a lie? why?
So you scanned him? When? Remind me what your night actions have been.
Rereading Riedquat, as far as I can see he has claimed scanning CrimsonFox on N1 and nothing else yet. I also found an interesting suggestion, that El Barto was killed by Visor.
09-29-2016, 17:27
novice
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Dp101, have you actually made any cases in this game? I kind of want to lynch you despite your eminent ability to look town.
09-29-2016, 17:43
Dp101
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by novice
Dp101, have you actually made any cases in this game? I kind of want to lynch you despite your eminent ability to look town.
I think most of my cases were early on, I was going to make one against Winston but couldn't find any of the evidence I remembered.
09-29-2016, 17:58
Murska
Re: Futuramafia [In Play]
Right. Well, I accept Pizza's claim for now. I still want to lynch GH, his claim is iffy, his lack of claimed actions is also terrible.
spaceman98