And it gets extremely hilarious when the definition attempting to prove "not a genocide", ie. removing a religious group from a limited area, is in fact the textbook definition of genocide.Originally Posted by Ronin
Re: responding to common objections to bible part 4
And it gets extremely hilarious when the definition attempting to prove "not a genocide", ie. removing a religious group from a limited area, is in fact the textbook definition of genocide.You attempts to "massage" the supposed biblical events so that they fall somewhere outside the definition of genocide do not impress me.
it is a sure sign of a weak position when a man starts pulling out semantic tricks.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks