Quote Originally Posted by Montmorency View Post
I've had the feeling that your run-through today has been makework, but this is a reasonable post, unbiased by the knowledge that I said it earlier.



lol read my posts



I make a note of this in my upcoming ISO, but are you sure you're not trying to pocket HK?



Yes, and not very surprising.



I think the reasons I developed were pretty strong.



Cape was hard on ladd multiple times D2, and voted him at least once (I recall briefly during EOD).



Not so?

#419/38: Dya questions the validity (via Boq's approbation) of Pizza's suspicion of Vulgard's level of tilt; dya finds annoyance non-indicative and references own experience. Boq agrees but considers disproportionate annoyance scum-leaning in a vacuum. But Boq now wishes to rescind this impression of Vulgard as the latter has posted more.

#426: Boq tells Pizza he's rescinding the weak scum read on dya.
I had no idea what post 426 meant when I read it and dismissed it as some kind of in joke that I didn't get.

So that's not a contradiction. I'm left with trying to decide whether the fairly weak day one interaction was scummy in itself (while taken at face value) and whether or not the constant shading thrown at me toDay means anything at all. I have a big issue with the post where he goes after me for shoving Visor into an early grave. He is townreading Hollowkatt and Ender both pretty hard right now, and they were the other two wagons that came up on day two. So why scum-shade me for pushing Visor in particular? I can only think of one potentially legitimate reason, and I haven't seen him say anything that would suggest he was thinking it at the time. Just the bare assertion that being assertive and wrong is scummy. Which is kind of easy for scum to shade somebody on.

My insomnia is kicking my ass again today but I'm going to try my hardest to at least get through the rest of the Dyachei spew before I have to lie down.