Quote Originally Posted by Renata View Post
I had no idea what post 426 meant when I read it and dismissed it as some kind of in joke that I didn't get.

So that's not a contradiction. I'm left with trying to decide whether the fairly weak day one interaction was scummy in itself (while taken at face value) and whether or not the constant shading thrown at me toDay means anything at all. I have a big issue with the post where he goes after me for shoving Visor into an early grave. He is townreading Hollowkatt and Ender both pretty hard right now, and they were the other two wagons that came up on day two. So why scum-shade me for pushing Visor in particular? I can only think of one potentially legitimate reason, and I haven't seen him say anything that would suggest he was thinking it at the time. Just the bare assertion that being assertive and wrong is scummy. Which is kind of easy for scum to shade somebody on.

My insomnia is kicking my ass again today but I'm going to try my hardest to at least get through the rest of the Dyachei spew before I have to lie down.
I told you in a post today that it wasn't a contradiction and i even showed you the whole conversation in context.


You're over-repping my shade on you. You're making it sound like it is some mindless thing, like a tunnel, when it isn't. I have criticised you and I have been paranoid. I am still waiting for you to explain how I am being aggressive tbh. Or was it you taking a shot and now can't stand for it tbh?

The reasons to town read Ender and HK are correct. I don't understand why it matters that they were also wagons but you pushed another townie hard?

"Just the bare assertion that bring assertive and wrong is scummy. Which is easy for scum to shade somebody on". Like how it is easy to shade someone who's playstyle you have decided is illegitimate tbh