Pokemon Nuzlocke FireRed Mafia [Concluded]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

This post:



khaan's most recent past games on the .Org, in reverse order:

- French Revolution Mafia: town, had a character schtick, not lynched
- Visor's Small Mafia Game: town (subbed in), sort of had a character schtick (speaking nothing in smilies, but only for a few posts), not lynched
- Tokens of My Confection: town, made two posts, not lynched
- Futuramafia: mafia, did not have a character schtick, not lynched (was vigged though IIRC)
- Polandball Mafia: town, made two posts, not lynched
- IKEA Mafia: town, did not have a character schtick, not lynched
- Bird Mafia: town, did not have a character schtick, not lynched

This goes back to March 2016. Does not compute.

---

couldn't he have been playing mafia in other games

and by games i mean sites

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

By "my first thought" I meant it was my first thought. It was the first thing that jumped out at me when I was catching up with the first glut of posts in the thread.



You kept going back to it, but on second thought I guess that could just be a natural extension of people responding to you and you furthering the conversation, which is stupid now that I look back on it.

Generally when people/myself say "not aligned" that strictly refers to "they're not mafia together".

I feel like half of the interactions people have been making with me/half the case on me has come down to pedantics, which is a dumb reason to lynch someone but then again I suppose I'm overdue to eat rope so que sera sera. Will try to put down some sick reads in the meantime.

---

isnt mafia all pedantics?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Csargo

:daisy: Back in the olden days we were. The times when khaans changed their names every thousand posts. Those were stricter times...

---

He's still issaikhaan to me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Montmorency

Isn't "Champ" a Pokemon?

---

Machamp.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy

El Barto votes GeneralHankerchief

---

Entirely, 100% true, as I promised my good friend @Snerk.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Champ

isnt mafia all pedantics?

---

The correct word is pedantry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Montmorency

Isn't "Champ" a Pokemon?

That would have been a proper disposable vote. Too late now though.

---

yes and yes

SeveringViper: By my count, khaan's played with everybody here (however briefly in some instances) except Champ. We'll throw Manasi and Logic in there too I guess because French Rev was a factional game and doesn't really fit in. Not really enough to get self-conscious about IMO.

novice: Re: your section of me in your longer post above, I was going to argue that your conclusion w/r/t your read of me is correct, but I feel like your reasons for reading me as such are bad, so I'm not sure what to do with you at the moment? but then I realized that most of the bones I had to pick with it were playstyle differences and thus not actual bad arguments.

Champ: As mentioned in a different post, khaan doesn't play games on other sites.

Another thing I want to make note of is in Champ's catchup just a few posts above this one, he jumps from my case on khaan (made earlier this morning US time) to commenting about my "pedantics" line (made last night US time), which strikes me as a bit unnatural way of catching up with the thread.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

Another thing I want to make note of is in Champ's catchup just a few posts above this one, he jumps from my case on khaan (made earlier this morning US time) to commenting about my "pedantics" line (made last night US time), which strikes me as a bit unnatural way of catching up with the thread.

---

i always do that

I will note posts #326 and #327 for tomorrow. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Champ

i always do that

---

Link to examples? IIRC the only game we played together on MU was Copless where you subbed in halfway through, so that's a bit different of a situation.

Roughly town to scum ordering:

Novice
Manasi - Few posts but got very good vibes from it/them
Cuthillius - Has a natural pro-town thread presence
Logic - Seems honest and open
SeveringViper - A for effort. More likely power wolfer than the guys above him

Raith Kemmler - Seems fine, just getting outshined.
El Barto - Objectively he's just a lurker, but he manages to come across as an active player. You could even chose to hold that against him. He should be lower on this list frankly.
Sooh - I like what I've seen so far but it should be well within her scum range.

GeneralHankerchief - Recovered somewhat from a bad start. Frankly gives off a better impression here than in many of his other day ones.
Jabbz - As discussed I'll give him some time.

Csargo / Champ - These two both seem somewhat active, but I think I'm confusing the two of them in my recollection of the thread, so I'll have to reread them.

Autolycus - Lurking but at least managed to sound like an honest lurker.
Montmorency - His thought processes are normally hard to follow, but in this game we haven't even been given a chance yet. I feel like he can easily do better, why is he holding back?
choxorn - So far he's not trying to be helpful
Seireikhaan - Trying to justify being unhelpful. Talks in generalities.

BSmith - One post so far? No opinion yet, willing to policy lynch.

Maybe I should call it a "won't lynch to will lynch" ordering instead. Typically you'll find a wolf amongst the top guys on a list like this, but I think it's the wrong end to start looking in.

That's kind of making me want to lynch Novice actually.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sooh

That's kind of making me want to lynch Novice actually.

---

Why?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

Link to examples? IIRC the only game we played together on MU was Copless where you subbed in halfway through, so that's a bit different of a situation.

---

its most games
i look at the vote count and see who voted who and why

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Champ

the sirie votes are stupid

---

Why's that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Champ

its most games
i look at the vote count and see who voted who and why

---

Don't have time to look right now, but I'll take your word for it. Kind of a dumb way to be caught if you're mafia and you're smarter than that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

Why?

---

Quick little quips and comments. Logic as townie because he's being honest and open about who he has played with and not before.

Idk, it just seems too neatly wrapped up in a bow, if that makes sense?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cuthillius

what do you think is scummy about monty/khaan

in your own words please

---

I do hope you don't mind if I use all of Monthy's words as well:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Montmorency

I don't know what's going on. Just tell me who scans type.

Or Vote: novice gets it.

---

Forced joke. Feels a tad wolfish to me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Montmorency

Two word Mafia.

Tell me what you see.

---

Null tell. I feel like I am missing some kind of subtext.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Montmorency

<3, OMG, let's meet up on IRC.

Unvote: novice; Vote: Severing Viper

---

Responding to Cuth: slight alarms going off here. Feels like a forced joke about breaking the spirit or the letter of the rules. If Monty turns wolf, I would not be surprised if Cuth is one as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Montmorency

Isn't "Champ" a Pokemon?

That would have been a proper disposable vote. Too late now though.

---

Comment's about casting throwaway vote based on username similarity on pokemon. Seems a tad wolfish to me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Montmorency

What if this is the result we seek?

---

Slight town lean here. This feels more helpful than not.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Montmorency

Viper is combination of novice, Zack, and Jabbz?

---

Speculation that seemingly leads nowhere. Not helpful in either case.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Montmorency

I yearn to rely on a stronger will.

I fear what I'm capable of in its absence.

---

I don't get what Monty is going for here. I don't normally assume being poetic is a wolf trait, but it feels more like an attempt to look more sophisticated, and thus, less wolfy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Montmorency

Doesn't inspire much sentiment. And Khaan has another semi-character here:



On the other other hand, this post is like his first Futuramafia posts in that he's complaining about certain tactical decisions for the early game:



But Khaan did always say the best way to play scum roles is to do that which the gut wouldn't believe.

---

Attacking his biggest lynch competitor with what looks like weak reasoning to me. Could be desperate wolf; could be incensed townie. I get the feeling that Monty is a good player, so I think there is more to this than he is saying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Montmorency

Tally plz GH is making a play for the badge.

---

The "Play for the badge" comment I am going to have to assume is one of those things under the avatars that GH seems to have already obtained several of. It seems weak reasoning for Monty to mention it, but I am suspicious of that comment in particular without more information.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

Why's that?

---

almost no substance
just throw a dart that will be just as effective

Logic's posts are good and logical. I think he's town.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Champ

almost no substance
just throw a dart that will be just as effective

---

Seireikhaan has no substance, or the votes on him have no substance?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

novice: Re: your section of me in your longer post above, I was going to argue that your conclusion w/r/t your read of me is correct, but I feel like your reasons for reading me as such are bad, so I'm not sure what to do with you at the moment? but then I realized that most of the bones I had to pick with it were playstyle differences and thus not actual bad arguments.

---

Just to make sure I'm parsing this correctly - You were going to argue that I was townreading you correctly, but for bad reasons?
But then you realized those reasons weren't bad, but just a bad/different playstyle?
(Stop me if I'm misunderstanding)
Wouldn't that still make the arguments bad, in your opinion?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

Seireikhaan has no substance, or the votes on him have no substance?

---

former

Wait, if Khaan has no substance, then why are you so defensive of him?

For that matter, you don't have much substance, either, you've made a lot of one-liner fluff posts and the only substantial thing you've done is defend khaan.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by novice

Just to make sure I'm parsing this correctly - You were going to argue that I was townreading you correctly, but for bad reasons?
But then you realized those reasons weren't bad, but just a bad/different playstyle?
(Stop me if I'm misunderstanding)
Wouldn't that still make the arguments bad, in your opinion?

---

OK, I think I get it now. You're saying that I backed off of you with bad arguments, but that it's not suspicious because it's in my nature to make bad town reads. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

Wait, if Khaan has no substance, then why are you so defensive of him?

For that matter, you don't have much substance, either, you've made a lot of one-liner fluff posts and the only substantial thing you've done is defend khaan.

---

bc there are better lynches but dont ask me lul
whats your point for the second paragraph

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by novice

OK, I think I get it now. You're saying that I backed off of you with bad arguments, but that it's not suspicious because it's in my nature to make bad town reads. :)

---

:inquisitive:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by novice

Just to make sure I'm parsing this correctly - You were going to argue that I was townreading you correctly, but for bad reasons?
But then you realized those reasons weren't bad, but just a bad/different playstyle?
(Stop me if I'm misunderstanding)
Wouldn't that still make the arguments bad, in your opinion?

---

You weren't misunderstanding. Some of the arguments in and of themselves are bad, but they're not necessarily scummy. They're just null in terms of alignment, which is what I care about more than getting into a playstyle discussion. Postgame for the latter, perhaps.

Also I'm not sure if I agree with Logic's case on Monty, but that's probably just from my inability to correctly read Monty in the first place. The case itself feels honest though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Logic

I do hope you don't mind if I use all of Monthy's words as well:

---

It's official: "Monty" is "Monthy" now.

D*** typos. If you ever find a post of mine on the Playground that has not been edited, count yourself lucky. I retyped this last sentence 4 times to get the grammar correct, and I am a native English speaker.

Also, I'm not finished with Khan. (That sounds way more menacing than I intended it to be.)

My last break at work is wrapping up, and I don't have time to explain in the same detail as I did for Monthy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Champ

bc there are better lynches but dont ask me lul
whats your point for the second paragraph

---

Better lynches, like who?

The point of your second paragraph is that I think you're scummy. I thought that would be obvious.

It's Khaan, Mr. Lhoghich. Khaan.

Also, I'm totally voting for Champ tomorrow.

I meant to say my second paragraph, not your second paragraph. I accidentally mixed up a word there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Barto

Also, I'm totally voting for Champ tomorrow.

---

why not today

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

Better lynches, like who?

The point of your second paragraph is that I think you're scummy. I thought that would be obvious.

---

:wall:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Champ

why not today

---

Good Question.

Unvote, Vote: Champ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

This post:



khaan's most recent past games on the .Org, in reverse order:

- French Revolution Mafia: town, had a character schtick, not lynched
- Visor's Small Mafia Game: town (subbed in), sort of had a character schtick (speaking nothing in smilies, but only for a few posts), not lynched
- Tokens of My Confection: town, made two posts, not lynched
- Futuramafia: mafia, did not have a character schtick, not lynched (was vigged though IIRC)
- Polandball Mafia: town, made two posts, not lynched
- IKEA Mafia: town, did not have a character schtick, not lynched
- Bird Mafia: town, did not have a character schtick, not lynched

This goes back to March 2016. Does not compute.

---

Really, dude? I've mentioned this before... a few times. Whatever. People got sore at me for having a schtick or for rp'ing because I "wasn't being serious". Now I don't bother and that's cause for alarm? Fine. Idek why I bother signing up.

vote:choxorn

Vote: Monty

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cuthillius

vote:choxorn

---

For the vote on Champ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by seireikhaan

Vote: Monty

---

Why?

You're frustrated with GH's push, do you think he's just being dumb?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SeveringViper

For the vote on Champ?



Why?

You're frustrated with GH's push, do you think he's just being dumb?

---

Yes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cuthillius

Yes.

---

Ok.

I think I agree. Vote: Choxorn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cuthillius

Yes.

---

What do you not like about my Champ vote?

A selection of Csargo's posts:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Csargo

It honestly took me a while to understand this...

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Csargo

You can click on the number of posts outside the thread and then selected whoevers # of posts you want to ISO, or at the top of the page there's a search thread -> advanced search -> input the username of whoever in the box and search. Both ways are a pain, and MU's ISO is far easier.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Csargo

Sooh's fireworks post is the best thing itt so far. I have yet to fully digest everything that has been said by the top three posters so far. I've been binge watching netflix and I'm sick, so my brain is a bit scrambled at the moment. I'll probably get around to actually reading everything fully tonight, and post thoughts then. I've just been skimming the thread tbh.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Csargo

This is an odd reaction to Sooh's post. Given how you've pursued D1 so far. I'm unsure of what you're trying to accomplish, Sooh was adding content to the thread, even if the question wasn't directed towards her. So why?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Csargo

How could Sooh's post effect novice's answer? I'm also unsure as to why you thought the question had value in the first place. I honestly don't understand the logic behind it. Feel like the answer would have to be some iteration of what he said, or else he'd look inconsistent. Are you always this antagonistic in games? Your posts give me that vibe, or am I delusional?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Csargo

So you saw Sooh's post as influential to your question/novice? I disagree, but to each their own. Mostly concerned with the tone of it all after the fact, rather than the question itself anyways.

Also, for my own understanding mostly, what was the purposed of going after Logic? What value did you gain from that interaction/argument?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Csargo

I was trying to determine what SV was doing, mostly because some of his reactions and arguments seemed scummy to me, because I didn't see what they accomplished. I think I understand what he's doing, I don't know if it has long-term value, but we'll see.

As far as reads go I don't have much. Think Barto seems himself so far, khaan's sort of half in character and half ooc not sure what to make of that. I'm unsure of SV, but want to see what happens going forward. Not sure I've ever played with SV before. I'm not sure what to make of novice yet, I'll probably go through the thread again tonight and see if anything jumps out to me. Actually I'll try to look through it before I have to work, because the day will be over, before I get off work iirc.

---

I like what I see so far actually. Is sick so doesn't post, but still reads the thread, as evidenced by the first few posts. Then has a back and forth with Viper which reads as genuine investigation. More would be better of course, but so far I like it.

I don't like manasi
Vote: Manasi

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Champ

I don't like manasi
Vote: Manasi

---

Why not?

Seriously, explain your thoughts a little more. One-liners don't say much of anything. Why don't you like Manasi, and why do you like Khaan?

My time is limited atm, could someone point a few post numbers to me that are making the major arguments against Chox? Thanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

Why not?

Seriously, explain your thoughts a little more. One-liners don't say much of anything. Why don't you like Manasi, and why do you like Khaan?

---

i feel like she doesnt want to be here and isnt enjoying herself
she loves being town and her lack of engagement is nagl
i dont like khaan i just dont think hes the best lynch

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SeveringViper

Ok.

I think I agree. Vote: Choxorn

---

I don't like the vote either.

Choxorn, you seem more concerned with delivering a vote with panache than with actually picking a good target:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

Does Vote: Novice count as two words?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

Okay, I'll talk about you.

Unvote, Vote: Manasi

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

Good Question.

Unvote, Vote: Champ

---

More to the point, you're discussing Seireikhaan's scumminess with Champ, and upon noticing that Champ thinks Seireikhaan has no substance (which he uses as an argument for not voting Seireikhaan), you suddenly realize that Champ has no substance and is scummy for it? It makes no sense. What exactly is your thought process here?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jabbz

My time is limited atm, could someone point a few post numbers to me that are making the major arguments against Chox? Thanks.

---

I don't think anybody has built a big case, he got votes just now for a dodgy vote on Champ, and he's come across as an unhelpful lurker. He seems to be delurking now though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jabbz

My time is limited atm, could someone point a few post numbers to me that are making the major arguments against Chox? Thanks.

---

His posts numbered 344, 351, and 357.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by novice

I don't like the vote either.

Choxorn, you seem more concerned with delivering a vote with panache than with actually picking a good target:

---

I admit, my first two votes were kinda jokey-random votes, the sort of early votes I do when I don't have any real feelings about anyone and just want to prod some people.

And I wasn't around for most of this day, for which I apologize- had a lot going on IRL over the weekend.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by novice

More to the point, you're discussing Seireikhaan's scumminess with Champ, and upon noticing that Champ thinks Seireikhaan has no substance (which he uses as an argument for not voting Seireikhaan), you suddenly realize that Champ has no substance and is scummy for it? It makes no sense. What exactly is your thought process here?

---

I wondered why Champ thought the Seireikhaan votes were stupid, as he put it. Honestly, I don't really like the case on khaan much either, but wanted to hear some more detailed thoughts from Champ on why he thought that.

I didn't really like his response, which prompted me to go look back through his posts, and then I noticed that he'd made mostly one-liner fluff posts before showing up to defend khaan, and he struck me as kinda scummy.

Champ: Seems like a strong player. May be self-resolving. Not lynching him today at any rate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Champ

i feel like she doesnt want to be here and isnt enjoying herself
she loves being town and her lack of engagement is nagl
i dont like khaan i just dont think hes the best lynch

---

You literally made this up on the spot.

You know I'm in 3 games right now.

You took my scum read on you and flipped it to me and that's insanely unrealistic and inaccurate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by novice

Champ: Seems like a strong player. May be self-resolving. Not lynching him today at any rate.

---

LOL STRONG PLAYER ded

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Manasi

LOL STRONG PLAYER ded

---

:laugh4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

I didn't really like his response, which prompted me to go look back through his posts, and then I noticed that he'd made mostly one-liner fluff posts before showing up to defend khaan, and he struck me as kinda scummy.

---

But he didn't show up to defend khaan. Nor did he defend khaan, either. Calling votes on someone stupid because that player hasn't posted any real content to vote them by yet ≠ defending the player. Khaan has done nothing of much value yet and in fact declared he won't for the time being, yet the votes are still stupid, based on stupid reasons (if any were given).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Manasi

LOL STRONG PLAYER ded

---

Yeah, I don't really get that vibe out of him, either.

Like would a strong player post something like this...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Champ

bc there are better lynches but dont ask me lul

---

And not really have any idea who these "better lynches" are?

Because that's really not a good defense of khaan- it's just saying "Don't lynch Khaan, there's better lynches, I don't know who they are but there's better lynches!"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by novice

:laugh4:

---

Hey qt3.14

How ya feelin'?

I've been sleeping all day so been super in and out of the thread.

Whatcha thinkin' besides your reads list up there?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SeveringViper

But he didn't show up to defend khaan. Nor did he defend khaan, either. Calling votes on someone stupid because that player hasn't posted any real content to vote them by yet ≠ defending the player. Khaan has done nothing of much value yet and in fact declared he won't for the time being, yet the votes are still stupid, based on stupid reasons (if any were given).

---

It's not a hard, strong defense, but calling out the votes on khaan and arguing against GH's case on him is still a defense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Manasi

You literally made this up on the spot.

You know I'm in 3 games right now.

You took my scum read on you and flipped it to me and that's insanely unrealistic and inaccurate.

---

You have a light scum read on him for being less active than you'd expect while he's hosting a champs game, he scum reads you for seeming less engaged than he'd expect while you're in three games at once...
How about both reads are dumb?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

It's not a hard, strong defense, but calling out the votes on khaan and arguing against GH's case on him is still a defense.

---

Fair enough.

Anyone have a vote tally right now? I think it's 4 on Monty, 3 on Khaan, 2 on GH, and 2 on me, but I'm not really sure.

Monty (4) Logic Bsmith Autolycus Seireikhaan
Khaan (3) GeneralHankerchief Novice Csargo
GH (2) El Barto Sooh
Choxorn (2) SeveringViper Cuthillius
Manasi (1) Champ
SeveringViper (1) Jabbz
Champ (1) choxorn
Sooh Raith (1) Kemmler
invalid vote (1) Monty
No vote (1) Manasi

Logic votes Montmorency
Montmorency votes invalid
BSmith votes Montmorency
GeneralHankerchief votes Khaan
El Barto votes GeneralHankerchief
Champ votes Manasi
Jabbz votes SeveringViper
Manasi votes ----
SeveringViper votes Choxorn
Novice votes Khaan
Csargo votes khaan
Autolycus votes Montmorency
choxorn votes Champ
Cuthillius votes Choxorn
Seireikhaan votes Montmorency
Raith Kemmler votes Sooh
Sooh votes GeneralHankerchief

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SeveringViper

You have a light scum read on him for being less active than you'd expect while he's hosting a champs game, he scum reads you for seeming less engaged than he'd expect while you're in three games at once...
How about both reads are dumb?

---

Rude.

Hosting a game only requires action at two points in the day.

He should be tres more active.

I made a few adjustments to the Vote Counter (also useful for ISOing) plugin, I think it understands all the various vote and unvote formats now. Be aware that bold red text won't be counted as a vote unless it's also prefixed with Vote:

Unoffical tally as of post 385:

Lynch votes
4 votes: Montmorency (BSmith, seireikhaan, autolycus, Logic)
3 votes: khaan (Csargo, GeneralHankerchief, novice)
2 votes: choxorn (Cuthillius, SeveringViper)
2 votes: GeneralHankerchief (El Barto, Sooh)
1 votes: Manasi (Champ)
1 votes: Sooh (Raith Kemmler)
1 votes: Champ (Choxorn)
1 votes: Severing Viper (Montmorency)

Voting history:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Raith Kemmler

Sooh

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Logic

Raith Kemmler

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by novice

Raith Kemmler

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

Novice

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Barto

GeneralHankerchief

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Csargo

seireikhaan

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

novice

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by seireikhaan

Novice

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by autolycus

Montmorency

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

Manasi

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Montmorency

novice

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SeveringViper

GeneralHandkerchief

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by novice

GeneralHandkerchief

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SeveringViper

Unvote

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SeveringViper

Unvote

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Montmorency

Severing Viper

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

khaan

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BSmith

Monty

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by novice

khaan

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cuthillius

Jabbz

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Logic

Montmorency

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sooh

GH

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

Champ

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cuthillius

choxorn

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by seireikhaan

Monty

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SeveringViper

Choxorn

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Champ

Manasi

---

In one hour, one of you will no longer be able to continue on this journey.

@Choxorn;

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Choxorn

Novice looks okay, slight town lean on him right now.

---

Does this still hold?
You have Logic as town for logical posts, do you agree with his case on Montmorency?
Do you have any other reads?

I have no idea what to think about Chox anymore after I utterly and spectacularly misfired on him in his champs game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

I have no idea what to think about Chox anymore after I utterly and spectacularly misfired on him in his champs game.

---

Damn.

You ever thought that you were bad or something?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Manasi

Hey qt3.14

How ya feelin'?

I've been sleeping all day so been super in and out of the thread.

Whatcha thinkin' besides your reads list up there?

---

Besides post 331, you can check post 307, 365 and 370.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Manasi

Damn.

You ever thought that you were bad or something?

---

Nah, I know I'm bad but just don't let it bother me.

Since you're obviously around, what're your thoughts on Chox? IIRC you correctly read him in champs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by novice

Besides post 331, you can check post 307, 365 and 370.

---

tbh I just wanted to have a conversation and not talk about the game but I guess you have other priorities.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

Nah, I know I'm bad but just don't let it bother me.

Since you're obviously around, what're your thoughts on Chox? IIRC you correctly read him in champs.

---

CanI turn off sigs on this site

Also meh. I was really put off by his instant pseudo aggression towards me very early on for ~no reason.

I think he has a decent chance of being a wolf.


I only called him a villa in champs bc all you idiots were calling him a wolf.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Manasi

CanI turn off sigs on this site

Also meh. I was really put off by his instant pseudo aggression towards me very early on for ~no reason.

I think he has a decent chance of being a wolf.


I only called him a villa in champs bc all you idiots were calling him a wolf.

---

Are you saying you're not a fan of my six-years-out-of-date sig pic?

Settings > General Settings > scroll down a bit to Thread Display Options > uncheck the box that says Show Signatures.

Fair enough re: Chox.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

Are you saying you're not a fan of my six-years-out-of-date sig pic?

Settings > General Settings > scroll down a bit to Thread Display Options > uncheck the box that says Show Signatures.

Fair enough re: Chox.

---

Thanks sweetheart. <3

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SeveringViper

@Choxorn;

Does this still hold?
You have Logic as town for logical posts, do you agree with his case on Montmorency?
Do you have any other reads?

---

Yeah, still got a slight town read on Novice.

Other reads:

Logic- town, I've liked all his posts so far. His case on Monty seems solid, although it tends to be hard to read Monty well, especially this early.

Monty- slight scum lean, but again it's hard to really read him well.

BSmith- null, he hasn't posted enough.

GH- Don't like his case on Khaan, getting some weird vibes from him but don't have any strong feelings about him yet. Somewhere from null to slight scum at this point.

El Barto- null, being his typical self.

Champ- scum lean, for reasons I've already explained.

Jabbz- null, haven't seen enough from him yet.

Manasi- slight town, her posts have looked solid so far.

SeveringViper- Sometimes I don't like your posts and sometimes I do, it averages out to about null right now.

Csargo- null, haven't seen enough to have much of an opinion on him.

Autolycus- null, hasn't said much which is typical for him.

Cuthillius- lean scum, partly for some things Logic pointed out between him and Monty and I'm getting weird vibes from him, too.

Seireikhaan- I don't like the case on him, but he hasn't done much to make himself look town yet, so I'd call it a null. Also, I find it kind of weird how much people have talked about him given how little he's actually said and done in this game.

Raith- null at this point, I've never been able to read him well.

Sooh- slight town lean, she looks good so far.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Manasi

tbh I just wanted to have a conversation and not talk about the game but I guess you have other priorities.

---

Oh... Awkward.

Do you like word puzzles? Here's a cryptic:
I'm a fan, endlessly playing this game of deception and deduction (5).

What do you think about my vote counter?

I was curious how Monty got to four votes, as I don't remember much of a push on him. Here's how:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by autolycus

Me, I'm a lurker, especially in the early game, but come out with analysis in the late game that gets stronger over time. Basically, I'm a geodude spamming rollout.

vote:Montmorency

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BSmith

Apologies for being AWOL. Typical weekend for me, unfortunately. I have read absolutely zero of the thread so far, so vote: Monty for purely random reasons. Will do my best to read and get caught up before end of day.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Logic

What was a joke vote for Raith I cannot support with any evidence. He seems rather quiet, but I don't know if that is how he plays on D1, so he gets a pass for now. With what little I have seen from him, I give hime a slight wolf lean.

Both Seireikhaan and Montmorency feel like as good of targets as any, so I'm going to tie it up for the now.
Vote: Montmorency

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by seireikhaan

Vote: Monty

---

Thought I'd share.